Addressing the UHC Challenge Using the Disease Control Priorities 3 Approach: Lessons Learned and an Overview of the Pakistan Experience

Author:

Alwan Ala1ORCID,Siddiqi Sameen2ORCID,Safi Malik3,Zaidi Raza3ORCID,Khalid Muhammad3,Baltussen Rob4ORCID,Gudumac Ina1ORCID,Huda Maryam2,Jansen Maarten4ORCID,Raza Wajeeha5,Torres-Rueda Sergio6ORCID,Zulfiqar Wahaj3,Vassall Anna6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. DCP3 Country Translation Project, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

2. Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan

3. Ministry of National Health Services, Regulations and Coordination, Islamabad, Pakistan

4. Department of Health Evidence, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

5. Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK

6. Department of Global Health & Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

Abstract

Background: Pakistan developed its first national Essential Package of Health Services (EPHS) as a key step towards accelerating progress in achieving Universal Health Coverage (UHC). We describe the rationale, aims, the systematic approach followed to EPHS development, methods adopted, outcomes of the process, challenges encountered, and lessons learned. Methods: EPHS design was led by the Ministry of National Health Services, Regulations & Coordination. The methods adopted were technically guided by the Disease Control Priorities 3 Country Translation project and existing country experience. It followed a participatory and evidence-informed prioritisation and decision-making processes. Results: The full EPHS covers 117 interventions delivered at the community, health centre and first-level hospital platforms at a per capita cost of US$29.7. The EPHS also includes an additional set of 12 population-based interventions at US$0.78 per capita. An immediate implementation package (IIP) of 88 district-level interventions costing US$12.98 per capita will be implemented initially together with the population-based interventions until government health allocations increase to the level required to implement the full EPHS. Interventions delivered at the tertiary care platform were also prioritised and costed at US$6.5 per capita, but they were not included in the district-level package. The national EPHS guided the development of provincial packages using the same evidence-informed process. The government and development partners are in the process of initiating a phased approach to implement the IIP. Conclusion: Key ingredients for a successful EPHS design requires a focus on package feasibility and affordability, national ownership and leadership, and solid engagement of national stakeholders and development partners. Major challenges to the transition to implementation are to continue strengthening the national technical capacity, institutionalise priority setting and package design and its revision in ministries of health, address health system gaps and bridge the current gap in financing with the progressive increase in coverage towards 2030.

Publisher

Maad Rayan Publishing Company

Subject

Health Policy,Health Information Management,Leadership and Management,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Health (social science)

Reference45 articles.

1. World Health Organization, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Tracking Universal Health Coverage: 2017 Global Monitoring Report. Geneva: WHO, The World Bank; 2017. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/640121513095868125/pdf/122029-WP-REVISED-PUBLIC.pdf. Accessed January 9, 2022.

2. World Health Organization, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Tracking Universal Health Coverage: 2021 Global Monitoring Report. Geneva: WHO, The World Bank; 2021. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/world-health-data-platform/events/tracking-universal-health-coverage-2021-global-monitoring-report_uhc-day.pdf?sfvrsn=fd5c65c6_5&download=true. Accessed January 9, 2022.

3. SDG Indicators. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs website. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/?Text=&Goal=3&Target=3.8. Accessed November 18, 2022.

4. The UN High-Level Meeting (UN HLM) on Universal Health Coverage, 23 September 2019, New York. UHC2030 website. https://www.uhc2030.org/un-hlm-2019/. Accessed November 18, 2022.

5. World Bank. World Development Report 1993: Investing in Health. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/5976. Accessed November 18, 2022.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3