The Experiences of Strategic Purchasing of Healthcare in Nine Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Qualitative Review

Author:

Sumankuuro Joshua123ORCID,Griffiths Frances14ORCID,Koon Adam D.5ORCID,Mapanga Witness16ORCID,Maritim Beryl178ORCID,Mosam Atiya8ORCID,Goudge Jane1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

2. Department of Public Policy and Management, SD Dombo University of Business and Integrated Development Studies, Wa, Ghana.

3. School of Community Health, Charles Sturt University, Orange, NSW, Australia.

4. Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

5. Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

6. School of Health Systems and Public Health, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.

7. Consortium for Advanced Research Training in Africa (CARTA), Nairobi, Kenya.

8. School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Abstract

Background: Efforts to move towards universal health coverage (UHC) aim to rebalance health financing in ways that increase efficiency, equity, and quality. Resource constraints require a shift from passive to strategic purchasing (SP). In this paper, we report on the experiences of SP in public sector health insurance schemes in nine middle-income countries to understand what extent SP has been established, the challenges and facilitators, and how it is helping countries achieve their UHC goals. Methods: We conducted a systematic search to identify papers on SP. Nine countries were selected for case study analysis. We extracted data from 129 articles. We used a common framework to compare the purchasing arrangements and key features in the different schemes. The evidence was synthesised qualitatively. Results: Five countries had health technology assessment (HTA) units to research what services to buy. Most schemes had reimbursement mechanisms that enabled some degree of cost control. However, we found evidenced-based changes to the reimbursement mechanisms only in Thailand and China. All countries have some form of mechanism for accreditation of health facilities, although there was considerable variation in what is done. All countries had some strategy for monitoring claims, but they vary in complexity and the extent of implementation; three countries have implemented e-claim processing enabling a greater level of monitoring. Only four countries had independent governance structures to provide oversight. We found delayed reimbursement (six countries), failure to provide services in the benefits package (four countries), and high out-of-pocket (OOP) payments in all countries except Thailand and Indonesia, suggesting the schemes were failing their members. Conclusion: We recommend investment in purchaser and research capacity and a focus on strong governance, including regular engagement between the purchaser, provider and citizens, to build trusting relationships to leverage the potential of SP more fully, and expand financial protection and progress towards UHC.

Publisher

Maad Rayan Publishing Company

Subject

Health Policy,Health Information Management,Leadership and Management,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Health (social science)

Reference140 articles.

1. World Health Organization (WHO). The World Health Report 2000: Health Systems: Improving Performance. WHO; 2000.

2. Health financing for universal coverage and health system performance: concepts and implications for policy

3. McIntyre D. Learning from Experience: Health Care Financing in Low-and Middle-Income Countries. Geneva: Global Forum for Health Research; 2007.

4. World Health Organization (WHO). Governance for Strategic Purchasing: An Analytical Framework to Guide a Country Assessment. WHO; 2019.

5. Honda A, Hanson K, Tangcharoensathien V, Huntington D, McIntyre D. Strategic purchasing’–definition and analytical framework used in the multi-country study. In: Strategic Purchasing in China, Indonesia and the Philippines. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016:2.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3