Stakeholders’ Perceived Barriers and Successes of Quality Improvement Programs for Patients With Diabetes Comment on "Quality and Performance Measurement in Primary Diabetes Care: A Qualitative Study in Urban China"

Author:

Neumann Ana1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of General Practice and Dental Public Health, School of Dentistry, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA

Abstract

Rasooly et al performed a qualitative evaluation to characterize the experiences of 26 stakeholders with the implementation of diabetes-related quality and performance measures delivered in primary healthcare to patients with diabetes in metropolitan China. Results from this cross-sectional investigation identified relevant gaps in primary care delivery for people with diabetes from one major center in China. As diabetes is a prevalent condition worldwide, lessons learned from this research can be useful to guide, refine, and improve quality measurement evaluations in primary care in China and other countries. In this commentary, we comment on the strengths and weaknesses of the study, suggest future directions, and discuss how lessons learned from this research can be helpful to guide, refine, and improve the quality measurement of diabetes care in other countries.

Publisher

Maad Rayan Publishing Company

Subject

Health Policy,Health Information Management,Leadership and Management,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Health (social science)

Reference9 articles.

1. World Health Organization. Quality Health Services. 2020. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/quality-health-services. Accessed November 12, 2022.

2. Crossing the Health-Care Quality Chasm: When Will Evidenced-Based Medicine Take Hold?

3. Quality and Performance Measurement in Primary Diabetes Care: A Qualitative Study in Urban China

4. Prevalence and Treatment of Diabetes in China, 2013-2018

5. National Quality Forum. NQF Begins Accepting Public Comments to Review Quality Measures Used in Federal Programs. 2022. https://www.qualityforum.org/News_And_Resources/Press_Releases/2022/NQF_Begins_Accepting_Public_Comments_to_Review_Quality_Measures_Used_in_Federal_Programs.aspx. Accessed November 12, 2022.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3