What, Where, and How to Collect Real-World Data and Generate Real-World Evidence to Support Drug Reimbursement Decision-Making in Asia: A reflection into the Past and A Way Forward

Author:

Kc Sarin1,Lin Lydia Wenxin2,Bayani Diana Beatriz Samson2,Zemlyanska Yaroslava2,Adler Amanda3,Ahn Jeonghoon4,Chan Kelvin567,Choiphel Dechen8,Genuino-Marfori Anne Julienne9,Kearney Brendon1011,Liu Yuehua12,Nakamura Ryota13,Pearce Fiona14,Prinja Shankar15,Pwu Raoh-Fang16,Akmal Shafie Arsul17,Sui Binyan12,Suwantika Auliya18,Tunis Sean19,Wu Hui-Min16,Zalcberg John2021,Zhao Kun12,Isaranuwatchai Wanrudee12223,Teerawattananon Yot12,Wee Hwee-Lin224

Affiliation:

1. Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Ministry of Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand

2. Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore, Singapore

3. The Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolism, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

4. Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea

5. Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada

6. Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada

7. Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Toronto, ON, Canada

8. Essential Medicine and Technology Division, Department of Medical Services, Ministry of Health, Thimphu, Bhutan

9. Health Technology Assessment Unit, Department of Health, Quezon City, Philippines

10. Faculty of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia

11. Health Policy Advisory Committee on Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

12. China Health Technology Assessment Centre, National Health Development Research Centre, Ministry of Health, Beijing, China

13. Hitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study, Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo, Japan

14. Agency for Care Effectiveness, Ministry of Health, Singapore, Singapore

15. Department of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

16. Taiwan National Hepatitis C Program Office, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taipei, Taiwan

17. Discipline of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia

18. Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, Indonesia

19. Center for Medical Technology Policy (CMTP), Baltimore, MD, USA

20. Cancer Research Program, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

21. Department of Medical Oncology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

22. Centre for Excellence in Economic Analysis Research, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada

23. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

24. Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore, Singapore

Abstract

Background: Globally, there is increasing interest in the use of real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) to inform health technology assessment (HTA) and reimbursement decision-making. Using current practices and case studies shared by eleven health systems in Asia, a non-binding guidance that seeks to align practices for generating and using RWD/RWE for decision-making in Asia was developed by the REAL World Evidence In ASia for HEalth Technology Assessment in Reimbursement (REALISE) Working Group, addressing a current gap and needs among HTA users and generators. Methods: The guidance document was developed over two face-to-face workshops, in addition to an online survey, a face-to-face interview and pragmatic search of literature. The specific focus was on what, where and how to collect RWD/ RWE. Results: All 11 REALISE member jurisdictions participated in the online survey and the first in-person workshop, 10 participated in the second in-person workshop, and 8 participated in the in-depth face-to-face interviews. The guidance document was iteratively reviewed by all working group members and the International Advisory Panel. There was substantial variation in: (a) sources and types of RWD being used in HTA; and (b) the relative importance and prioritization of RWE being used for policymaking. A list of national-level databases and other sources of RWD available in each country was compiled. A list of useful guidance on data collection, quality assurance and study design were also compiled. Conclusion: The REALISE guidance document serves to align the collection of better quality RWD and generation of reliable RWE to ultimately inform HTA in Asia.

Publisher

Maad Rayan Publishing Company

Subject

Health Policy,Health Information Management,Leadership and Management,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Health (social science)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3