Data Consistency of Two National Registries in Iran: A Preliminary Assessment to Health Information Exchange

Author:

Dashtkoohi Mohammad123ORCID,Poursalehian Mohammad12,Azadmanjir Zahra41,Vaeidi Masoomeh5,Mohammadzadeh Mahdi5,Sharif-Alhoseini Mahdi1,Naghdi Khatereh1,Moniri Asl Marzieh6,Harrop James7,Rahimi-Movaghar Vafa13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2. Students’ Scientific Research Center (SSRC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3. Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

4. Department of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

5. Trauma Research Center, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran

6. Health Information Technology Department, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran

7. Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Abstract

Background: The National Spinal Cord Injury Registry of Iran (NSCIR-IR) and the National Trauma Registry of Iran (NTRI) were established to meet the data needs for research and assessing trauma status in Iran. These registries have a group of patients shared by both registries, and it is expected that some identical data will be collected about them. A general question arises whether the spinal cord injury registry can receive part of the common data from the trauma registry and not collect them independently. Methods: We examined variables captured in both registries based on structure and concept, identified the overlapping period during which both systems recorded data in the same centers and extracted relevant data from both registries. Further, we evaluated the data for any discrepancies in amount or nature and pinpointed the underlying reasons for any inconsistencies. Results: Out of all the variables in the NSCIR-IR database, 18.6% of variables were similar to the NTRI in terms of concept and structure. Although four hospitals participated in both registries, only two (Sina and Beheshti Hospitals) had common cases. Patient names, prehospital intubation, ambulance arrival time, ICU length of stay, and admission time were consistent across both registries with no differences. Other common data variables had significant discrepancies. Conclusion: This study highlights the potential for health information exchange (HIE) between NSCIR-IR and NTRI and serves as a starting point for stakeholders and policymakers to understand the differences between the two registries and work toward the successful adoption of HIE.

Publisher

Maad Rayan Publishing Company

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3