Validating a research professionalism model for faculty members at the Tabriz University of Medical Sciences: partial least squares structural equations modeling

Author:

Sabouri Monireh1ORCID,Talebi Behnam1ORCID,Daneshvar Harris Zarrin1ORCID,Alizadeh Mahasti2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Educational Science, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

2. Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Health Management and Safety Promotion Research Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

Background: All researchers who carry out scientific research should consider the observance of research professionalism, which is indispensable. This study was carried out to validate a research professionalism model for faculty members at the Tabriz University of Medical Sciences.Methods: The research methods used in this study were applied in terms of the research purpose and survey for data collection. The statistical population consisted of all faculty members at the Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, of whom 16 individuals were selected through purposeful sampling for the qualitative section and 260 were selected through stratified random sampling for the quantitative section. Data gathering tools included interviews and questionnaires. Cronbach’s alpha and content validity were used to determine the reliability and validity of the measurement tools. The grounded theory method was used to analyze the qualitative data, and structural equation modeling (PLS) was used for the quantitative data. Results: Research ethics model based on causal conditions, contextual and interventional factors, strategies, developing consequences and results of a first order factor analysis showed that the measurement models possessed composite reliability, divergent validity and convergent validity. The results of a second order factor analysis showed that structural models possessed an average or above coefficient of determination R² as well as an above-average Q2 prediction criterion. T values were significant (P>0.05). Goodness of fit (GOF) was 41 (not significant). Conclusion: The designed model shows both reliability and validity and an acceptable goodness of fit. Given the multidimensional nature of research professionalism, its promotion requires a systematic look at the foreground, concurrent events, consequences, and feedback on each dimension and related structures.

Publisher

Maad Rayan Publishing Company

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference33 articles.

1. Boyd D, Grossman P, Lankford H, Loeb S, Wyckoff J. Who Leaves? Teacher Attrition and Student Achievement. Cambridge, Mass: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2008.

2. Ethics in scientific research process;Moharati Y;Ethics in Science and Technology,2014

3. Typology of plagiarism using the experiences of experts in Isfahan university of medical sciences, Iran;Keyvan Ara M;Health Inf Manag,2013

4. 'Stop Stealing Our Stories': The Ethics of Research with Vulnerable Groups

5. Ethical standards in human sciences researches;Iman MT;Ethics in Science and Technology,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3