Detrital zircon ages and proposed provenance of the Koegas Subgroup of the Ghaap Group, and overlying Makganyene Formation, of the Postmasburg Group, Transvaal Supergroup

Abstract

Abstract The late Archaean to early Palaeoproterozoic strata of the Transvaal Supergroup of southern Africa is renowned for hosting geological units that preserve some the Earth’s most significant geological events. The glaciogenic Makganyene Formation is one such significant unit, given that it has been associated with the Snowball Earth Event. The maximum age of deposition of this formation, and subsequent timing of this event, has come into question, mostly because of concordant detrital zircon ages as young as ~2.2 Ga reported by Beukes et al. (2013). These ages are younger than the recently revised ca. 2.43 Ga baddeleyite age inferred for the overlying Ongeluk Formation and subsequently led to a significant revision of a long-held correlation between the upper Postmasburg- and Pretoria groups of the respective sub-basins of the Transvaal Supergroup. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the mode of occurrence of the ~2.2 Ga zircons in the Makganyene Formation as well as selected formations of the underlying Koegas Subgroup. Here, we report a total of 183 near concordant U-Pb zircon ages for the Koegas Subgroup (Pannetjie- and Naragas formations) and 967 such ages for the Makganyene Formation, extracted from seventeen samples from across the outcrop area for these units. Sensitive High Resolution Ion MicroProbe (SHRIMP) as well as three different Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) techniques were used for U-Pb age measurements. We assessed the quality of the respective data sets and possible shortcomings of the techniques to constrain the maximum age of deposition of the units and to infer possible source areas for the detritus. In contrast to zircon ages determined for the Koegas Subgroup, zircons younger than ~2.4 Ga are a prominent feature of the Makganyene Formation. Upon careful consideration of each data set, we concluded that these so-called young grains have likely suffered significant Pb-loss and that a possible overcorrection for common Pb during data reduction could not be ruled out. Although the age distribution generated using the respective techniques were comparable, none of the four techniques were successful in shedding light on the reliability of the ~2.2 Ga ages. The maximum age of deposition of the Makganyene Formation could not be constrained with confidence and therefore the revised correlation between the Postmasburg- and Pretoria groups is not contested. The detrital zircon age distribution of the Koegas-Makganyene succession was however found to be remarkably similar, with a major ~2.5 Ga age fraction and subordinate fractions at ~2.65 to ~2.9 Ga and older than ~3.0 Ga. The major ~2.5 Ga zircon age fraction points towards a prominent, likely orogenic source of detritus. We assign the origin of the major ~2.5 Ga and older zircon age fractions to a Rae-type craton, which we proposed to have been attached to the north of the Vaalbara Craton at time of deposition of these units and consider a tectono-magmatic event characteristically associated with this family of cratons as the possible cause of alteration and Pb-loss in zircon grains dated at ~2.2 Ga.