The Trend of Four Consultation Models in Four Specialties at Four Tertiary Care Hospitals

Author:

Abdulghani Hamza Mohammad,Sattar Kamran,Karim Syed Irfan,Ahmad Tauseef,Akram Ashfaq,Alsalem Rakan,Alruwaite Mohammed,Alkhraiji Nasser,Alghamdi Ghanem,Alkhulaifi Anas

Abstract

Background and Aim: Multiple consultation models exist in medical practice. A comprehensive doctor-patient relationship serves as a foundation to bring about a positive outcome in terms of patient health. However, evidence of doctors’ impact on improving patients’ mental and physical health through a specific model is sparse. This study aimed to identify the most common consultation models adopted in four different specialties at four hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Methods: From four tertiary care hospitals of Riyadh, clinicians (n=263) with clinical experience >3 years from Internal Medicine, Surgery, Family Medicine, and Psychiatry departments participated in this observational study. A 27-items questionnaire describing five consultation models was carried out in hard copy and a soft copy using the Snowball sampling method to receive the responses that were analyzed by using SPSS version 23.0 in the form of descriptive results. Results: Out of 263, most clinicians (n=121, 46.0 %) were found to practice a blended consultation approach while dealing with patients. The 2nd most common adopted consultation model was the Deliberative model (n= 109, 41.4%). Other consultation (Informative and Interpretive) models were the least practiced models (1.5%). Conclusion: The blended consultation is found to be the most practiced consultation model. A clinician should adopt an attitude that is flexible and empathetic towards patients’ needs and expectations. Consideration should be given to assisting physicians in adapting their roles for interpersonal styles to the preferences of various patients. This expanded role will result in improved health outcomes for diverse populations utilizing health care. Key words: Deliberative model, Doctor Behavior, Family Medicine, Interpretive Model, Paternalistic Model, Informative Model, Psychiatry

Publisher

Medi + World International

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3