Carcinogenicity testing of IL-10: principles and practicalities

Abstract

IL-10 is a cytokine with actions at many levels of the immune system. In the course of development of recombinant human IL-10 (rhuIL-10) as a potential treatment for a number of chronic diseases of man, the question `What about its carcinogenicity testing?’ was repeatedly asked, based on scientific evaluation by toxicologists, beliefs about regulatory requirements, and questions considered likely to be raised by physicians, patients, and lawyers. The feasibility of various approaches to the carcinogenicity testing of rhuIL-10 is critically discussed here as a contribution to rational consideration of the general need for and value of such testing, and its particular feasibility for a recombinant human protein with profound effects on the immune system. The physiological functions of IL-10 in man and rodents are reviewed in detail, as there are notable differences between species in its normal activities, followed by detailed evaluation of the potential procedures and practical problems of its carcinogenicity testing as a heterologous, immunogenic protein in rodents. The value of information that might be obtained from transgenic mice is also evaluated, and so are the results of studies exploring its actions on human tumour cell biopsies and rodent and human cell lines. It is concluded that despite the probable popular and regulatory expectations that carcinogenicity test results would be provided, all the physiological and pathological information reveals no indication that rhuIL10 would pose a carcinogenic risk to humans on prolonged administration, and that it would not be feasible to undertake such experimentation. It is argued that in this, as in other instances, professional and popular expectations have run beyond practical feasibility or theoretical justification. Cautious and critical evaluation should be made every time shorter or longer term toxicity studies of any candidate drug are planned or even considered, especially if it is a recombinant protein, to decide on objective grounds whether the studies are really necessary and whether they can be done in a way that will give meaningful results that will help in risk assessment.