Encounters with doctors: quantity and quality

Author:

Smith S D M,Nicol K M,Devereux J,Cornbleet M A1

Affiliation:

1. Marie Curie Centre Fairmile, Edinburgh

Abstract

Continuity of care and the large numbers of health care professionals who deliver that care are issues that frequently concern patients and their families. This study examined the number of doctors encountered by 50 patients, during the period of their cancer care. This ranged from 4 months to 26 years, with a median time of 2 years and 4 months. The doctors included in this number were general practitioners, doctors met during hospital inpatient admissions and when attending outpatient appointments, and doctors at the hospice. Descriptive statistics are included detailing the total number of doctors encountered by patients; the number met by patients within the first year of their cancer care; and the average number of new doctors met each year. The minimum number of doctors met was 13, maximum 97 and median 32. Notable examples include one patient who met 31 doctors during a 6-month period, and one patient who met 73 doctors during a period of 2 years and 1 month. Patients in this study with a history of less than 1 year met 28 doctors on average. Semi-structured interviews with these patients were conducted adopting a qualitative approach. Patients were asked about their recollections of the doctors they had met during their cancer care and what value they attributed to these encounters. Interviews were subject to thematic analysis. The major themes to emerge were: continuity of care, the provision of information and explanations and honesty in that process, breaking of bad news, the manner adopted by the doctor and issues relating to specialist referral. The large number of health care professionals, including the doctors quantified in this study, involved in the care of each patient represents a major challenge to ‘seamless’ and consistent communication between those involved.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3