Effects of two differently heparin-coated extracorporeal circuits on markers for brain and myocardial dysfunction

Author:

Flom-Halvorsen Hanne I1,Øvrum E2,Brosstad F3,Tangen G2,Ringdal M AL2,Øystese R2

Affiliation:

1. Oslo Heart Center, Oslo, Norway, Research Institute for Internal Medicine, University of Oslo, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway,

2. Oslo Heart Center, Oslo, Norway

3. Research Institute for Internal Medicine, University of Oslo, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway

Abstract

Objective: The two most commonly used heparin-coated systems for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) are the Carmeda Bio-Active Surface (CBAS) (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and the Duraflo II coating (Baxter Healthcare, Irvine, CA, USA). The two surfaces are technically unequal and previous experimental studies have demonstrated disparities in effects on the immune system and blood cells. However, little is known concerning the influence of the two surfaces on markers for brain and myocardial dysfunction. Methods: Forty patients undergoing elective, primary coronary bypass grafting with CPB were prospectively randomized to either the CBAS system or the Duraflo II circuit. During and after CPB, biological markers for brain dysfunction and myocardial injury were analysed. Results: Both markers for brain dysfunction S-100B and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) increased significantly during CPB ( p =0.01). The elevation during bypass correlated significantly with the duration of CPB ( r = 0.39 and r= 0.38, respectively, both p< 0.02). NSE was somewhat more elevated in the Duraflo II group at the end of CPB ( p =0.01) and 5 h after CPB ( p= 0.02); for S-100B, there were no intergroup differences. Also, the markers related to myocardial injury, myoglobin and creatine kinase (CK-MB) mass increased during CPB ( p= 0.01), while elevation of troponin-I occurred 5 h after CPB ( p= 0.01). There were no statistically significant intergroup differences. No significant correlation was seen between the release of cardiac markers and the duration of CPB. The clinical course was similar in both groups. Conclusions: Except for a slightly higher elevation of NSE at the end of CPB and 5 h after CPB in the Duraflo II group, there were no significant differences between the CBAS group and the Duraflo II group concerning markers for brain and myocardial dysfunction.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Advanced and Specialised Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Safety Research,Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3