The influence of intraoperative sedation on memory consolidation: a single-blind randomized controlled trial

Author:

Churakov V. O.1ORCID,Zaitsev A. Yu.2ORCID,Vzorin G. D.3ORCID,Bukinich A. M.3ORCID,Dubrovin K. V.2ORCID,Anokhin K. V.4ORCID,Nourkova V. V.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University); Municipal Clinical Hospital № 31

2. I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University); Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery

3. Lomonosov Moscow State University

4. Lomonosov Moscow State University; P.K. Anokhin Research Institute of Normal Physiology

Abstract

The objective was to evaluate the effect of propofol and dexmedetomidine sedation on the short-term memory and long-term memory consolidation.Materials and methods. 80 patients with small orthopaedic interventions under subarachnoid anesthesia were included in the randomized controlled trial. Three groups were formed depending on the drug used: group P – propofol, group D – dexmedetomidine, group 0 – control. Emotionally neutral sets of words were tapped three times to evaluate the effect of sedation on long-term memory consolidation: stage1/set 1 – immediately before sedation (RASS 0, BIS 95–100), stage 2/set 2 – 5–10 minutes after the start of sedation (RASS «–1» – «–2», BIS 70–90), stage 3/set 3 – 10 minutes after sedation was terminated and consciousness was recovered (RASS 0, BIS 90–100). In addition, the impact of sedation on the ability to hold the received information in short-term memory was conducted 5 minutes after the presentation of the words at stage 2. Reproduction and recognition testing of all words was conducted the next day after operation to evaluate the effect of medical sedation on long-term memory consolidation.Results. Propofol and dexmedetomidine provided an inhibitory effect on the ability to hold information in short-term memory compared to control group (р < 0.001 и р < 0.001, respectively). Propofol had the most effect on short-term memory and the level of its amnesic effect was associated with the cognitive function of patients (p = 0.013, R² = 0.23, β = 0.472). The HADS points were as negative predictor of the reproduction of the word set 1 in control group (p = 0.05, R² = 0.136, β = –0.368) and recognition of the word set 3 in propofol group (р = 0.029, R² = 0.176, β = –0.420). Within 24 hours after operation, reproduction and recognition of word sets 2 depended on the degree of short-term memory impairment during sedation (F(1.65) = 19.317, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.229 и F(1.65) = 21.638, p < 0.0031, ηp2 = 0.250, respectively). Short-term memory test acted as a positive predictor of the reproduction of word set 3 in control group (p = 0.05, R² = 0.141, β = 0.376).Conclusion. Propofol and dexmedetomidine impair the ability to retain information in short-term and, consequently, long-term memory, and propofol has a more pronounced amnesic effect, which depends on the cognitive functions of patients. The sensitivity to the amnesic effect of the drugs depends on the individual characteristics of the patients.

Publisher

FSBEI HE I.P. Pavlov SPbSMU MOH Russia

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Emergency Medicine

Reference26 articles.

1. Andriushchenko A.V., Drobizhev M.Iu, Dobrovol’skiĭ A.V. A comparative validation of the scale CES-D, BDI, and HADS(d) in diagnosis of depressive disorders in general practice. Zh. Nevrol. Psikhiatr. Im. S. S. Korsakova, 2003, vol. 103, no. 5, pp. 11–18. (In Russ.)

2. Nasreddine Z. et al. Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale – Moca-Test: translated by O.V. Posokhin and A.Y. Smirnov, 2004. (In Russ.) URL: www. mocatest.org.

3. Ovezov A.M., Panteleeva M.V., Knyazev A.V., Lugovoy A.V., Bragina S.V. Cognitive dysfunction and general anesthesia: From pathogenesis to prevention and correction. Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics, 2016, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 101–105. (In Russ.) Doi:10.14412/2074-2711-2016-3-101-105.

4. Procenko D.N. International Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Pain, Agitation and Delirium in Adult Patients in the Intensive Care Unit. Medical alphabet, 2014, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 27–30. (In Russ.)

5. Chen X., Zheng X., Cai J. et al. Effect of Anesthetics on Functional Connectivity of Developing Brain. Front. Hum. Neurosci, 2022, vol. 11, pp. 16:853816. Doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.853816.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3