Comparative study of the difficulty of endotracheal intubation in sniffing and 25-degree backup positions

Author:

Ibrahem G.1

Affiliation:

1. Al-Farahidi University

Abstract

Introduction. The endotracheal intubation procedure is integral to modern medicine and essential to emergency care, surgical practice and intensive care procedures.The objective was to evaluate the effect of the 25° backup position on glottic view and difficulty of intubation compared to the sniffing position in adult patients receiving general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubationMaterials and methods. The comparative clinical study was conducted in Al-Hussain Military Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq during the period from 1st of January 2022 to 1st of January 2023. A convenient sample of 150 patients who aged 18–60 years, were classified according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists as I or II, and underwent elective surgery under general anaesthesia was included in this study. These patients were allocated into two groups. Group A consisted of 75 patients who were anaesthetized in the sniffing position. Group B consisted of 75 patients who were anaesthetized in 25° backup position.Results. There was no significant difference between the sniffing position and 25° backup position regarding the number of patients who needed ancillary manoeuvres and ancillary equipment (P-values were 0.583 and 0.151, respectively). The glottic view was significantly better in the 25° backup position than the sniffing position according to the Cormack–Lehane (p = 0.001) with a significantly lower difficulty in intubation according to the intubation difficulty scale (p = 0.008).Conclusion. The 25° backup position is better than the sniffing position in glottic visualization, the difficulty of intubation and the time of intubation. Age, gender, and body mass index have no significant effects on the visualization of the glottis between the 25° backup position and the sniffing position. There was no significant difference between two regarding the number of patients who needed ancillary manoeuvres and ancillary equipment. The glottic view is significantly better in the 25° backup position than sniffing position according to the Cormack–Lehane. The mean of the time of intubation is lower in the 25° backup position compared to the sniffing position.

Publisher

FSBEI HE I.P. Pavlov SPbSMU MOH Russia

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3