Features of laparoscopic and conventional decompression of the сeliac trunk

Author:

Bagnenko S. F.1ORCID,Vasilevsky D. I.1ORCID,Ignashov A. M.1ORCID,Кнamid Z. M.1ORCID,Puzanov S. Yu.2ORCID,Rumyantsev I. P.2ORCID,Balandov S. G.1ORCID,Morozov A. N.1ORCID,Suprunovich A. A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Pavlov University

2. Elizabethan Hospital

Abstract

The OBJECTIVE was to study the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic decompression of the celiac trunk.METHODS AND MATERIALS. A comparative analysis of the results of laparoscopic (30 patients) and conventional decompression of the celiac trunk (50 patients) was carried out. All patients were operated on between September 2018 and July 2021.RESULTS. Intraoperative bleeding during laparoscopic decompression of the celiac trunk, which required conversion of access to laparotomy and vascular suture, was noted in 2 (6.7 %) cases. With conventional access, there were no such complications. The average duration of laparoscopic decompression of the celiac trunk was 107 minutes, from conventional access – 150 minutes. The average length of hospital stay after laparoscopic intervention was 4 days, after the traditional one – 7 days. Long-term results of treatment over a period of more than 6 months were evaluated in 28 patients who underwent laparoscopic decompression of the celiac trunk and 45 people who underwent conventional decompression. Ultrasound examination in all cases stated the return of linear and velocity parameters of blood flow in the celiac trunk to normal. complete relief of the clinical manifestations of the disease was achieved in 24 (85.7 %) patients after laparoscopic and in 39 (86.7 %) after traditional intervention.CONCLUSION. Laparoscopic decompression of the celiac trunk is an effective method of surgical treatment of the syndrome of compression of the celiac trunk, but there are risks of vascular damage. The long-term results of laparoscopic and open decompression of the celiac trunk are comparable.

Publisher

FSBEI HE I.P. Pavlov SPbSMU MOH Russia

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3