Affiliation:
1. City Multiservice hospital № 2
2. Almazov National Medical Research Centre
3. City Multiservice hospital № 2; North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
4. North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. Assessment of the mid-term results after various types of debranching in hybrid surgery of the aortic arch and descending thoracic aorta.METHODS AND MATERIALS. 47 patients with various pathologies of the aortic arch and descending thoracic aorta were operated on. Six of them suffered from type IIIa dissection and 26 from type IIIb dissection according to DeBakey classification, 15 patients had true aortic aneurysms. The following interventions were performed: total aortic arch debranching (n=5), cross subclavian-subclavian-left-common carotid (n=14) or cross carotid-carotid-subclavian bypass (n=7); subclavian-carotid transposition or bypass (n=12); Chimney technique for the aortic arch aneurysm (n=8); in situ fenestration of the endoprosthesis (n=1). Elective surgery was performed in 32 patients, emergency in 15.RESULTS. Technical success achieved in 100 %. The overall hospital mortality rate was 10.6 % (n=5), elective surgery mortality rate was 9.3 % (n=3), in emergency cases - 13.3 % (n=2). Causes of mortality: stroke (n=1), multiple organ failure after prosthetic ascending aorta due to retrograde dissection after stent graft implantation (n=1), pneumonia (n=1), acute myocardial infarction (n=1), profuse bleeding (n=1). Cumulative survival rate was 87.5 % over 5 years, freedom from reinterventions - 89.1 %. During the first year of observation, 3 patients underwent stent graft replacement of the descending thoracic aorta due to formation of a dissection below the primary stent graft (n=1), open prosthesis of the ascending aorta due to it retrograde dissection (n=1), endofixation of the stent graft with embolization of the false lumen (n=1).CONCLUSION. Hybrid surgery on the aortic arch and the descending thoracic aorta is safe and effective treatment. Regular follow-up and timely treatment of complications in the long term after hybrid or endovascular interventions are necessary to improve long-term results.
Publisher
FSBEI HE I.P. Pavlov SPbSMU MOH Russia
Reference21 articles.
1. Moulakakis K. G., Mylonas S. N., Markatis F., Kotsis T., Kakisis J., Liapis C. D. A systematic review and meta-analysis of hybrid aortic arch replacement // Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2(3):247-260. Doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2013.05.06.
2. Gordeev M. L., Uspenskij V. E., Bakanov A. Ju. et al. Rekonstruktivnye vmeshatel'stva na duge aorty pri hirurgicheskom lechenii anevrizm i rassloenij voshodjashhego otdela aorty // Patologija krovoobrashhenija i kardiokhirurgija. 2016;20(4):45-57. (In Russ.).
3. Benedetto U., Melina G., Angeloni E., Codispoti M., Sinatra R. Current results of open total arch replacement versus hybrid thoracic endovascular aortic repair for aortic arch aneurysm: a meta-analysis of comparative studies // J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145(1):305-306. Doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.011
4. Xydas S., Mihos C. G., Williams R. F. et al. Hybrid repair of aortic arch aneurysms: a comprehensive review // J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(7):S629-S634. Doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.06.47.
5. Bosiers M. J., Donas K. P., Mangialardi N. et al. European Multicenter Registry for the Performance of the Chimney/Snorkel Technique in the Treatment of Aortic Arch Pathologic Conditions // Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101(6):2224-2230. Doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.10.112