Author:
Blystad Magnus H.,Grøgaard Simen Christensen
Abstract
Understanding of the concept of empathy is often subject to change. The manifold conceptualisations, as well as the terminological ambiguities regarding the concept, are observed by studying interdisciplinary, overlapping and even contrasting perspectives of the phenomena across public discourse and academic literature. In this article we do not attempt to reduce the concept of empathy to a single entity, but rather strive to illuminate the many approaches to it. We identify a categorisation of the literature on empathy into two overarching approaches and propose two prototypical epistemological positions that might describe the definitional variations in understanding and applying it, namely a phenomenological or a positivist model underlying understandings of the concept. These two categories encompass wide subsets of traditions and perspectives which we summarise in a nomological network. Such a framing enables us to document the basis for the concept of empathy within a diversity of disciplinary traditions. Keywords: empathy, phenomenology, positivism, nomological network
Reference70 articles.
1. Argott, P. J., Townsend, D. B. & Poulson, C. L. (2017). Acquisiti- on and Generalization of Complex Empathetic Responses Among Children with Autism. Behavior Analysis Practice, 10, 107-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-016-0171-7
2. Baron-Cohen, S. (2012). The Science of Evil: On Empathy and the Origins of Cruelty. Basic Books.
3. Baron-Cohen, S. & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex diferences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 163-175. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00
4. Bartal, I. B.-A., Decety, J. & Mason, P. (2011). Empathy and pro-social behavior in rats. Science, 334, 1427-1431. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1210789
5. Bloom, P. (2016). Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion. Ecco Books.