Problematic Issues of Scientific and Methodical Support of the Forensic Cost Evaluation of Real Estate Objects and the Ways to Solve Them

Author:

Ivanov D. V.1ORCID,Karnaukhova O. G.1ORCID,Kozin P. A.2ORCID,Kuznetsov D. D.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering

2. RMS-Evaluation

3. Leningrad Regional Institution of Cadastral Valuation

Abstract

The aim of the article is to develop a scientific and methodical support for the forensic cost evaluation of real estate objects defferent from the federal appraisal standards. The authors solve the problem of comparative analysis of the professional activity of a real estate appraiser and a forensic expert who determines the market value, they also reveal their formal and substantive differences. They come to a reasonable conclusion about the necessity to develop a special methodology for forensic cost evaluation, as a study focused on the judicial system and considering the modern achievements in construction sciences, international valuation standards.The proposed methodology includes the analysis of two evaluations presented by the litigants and the fair (equilibrium) value of the property in a forensic expert’s opinion. The authors offer to compare two cost models identifying the critical parameters that led to the formation of the initial cost interval.The proposed version of scientific and methodical support does not require changes in the legislation and federal evaluation standards, but it involves the development of the guidelines for determining fair value by comparing the estimates submitted to the court by the parties to the dispute. The suggested methodology presents some additional opportunities for the development of a system of pre-trial resolution of disputes.

Publisher

Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice (RFCFS)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference15 articles.

1. Kozin P.A., Kuznetsov D.D. Forensic Cost Evaluation and Federal Appraisal Standards. Materials of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with International Participation “Specialized Economic Knowledge in Legal Proceedings” (Moscow, April 7, 2017). Moscow, Universitet im. O.E. Kutafina (MGYuA), 2017. P. 237–243. (In Russ.).

2. Volovich N.V. Establishing the Value of Property in Forensic Examination. Particularities of Determining the Value of Land Plots During Their Withdrawal for State Needs in the Framework of Forensic Examination. Round Table of the Union of Financial Economic Forensic Experts “Theory and Practice of Forensic Examination in Economic Disputes and Cases in Criminal, Civil, Arbitration and Administrative Proceedings” (Moscow. March 29, 2019). Moscow: Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi universitet pravosudiya (RGUP), 2019. (In Russ.).

3. Chesnokova E.V. The Process Approach in Forensic Activity as a Formalized Reflection of Its Stages and Algorithms. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2020. Vol. 15. No. 4. P. 56– 65. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2020-4-56-65

4. Butyrin A.Yu., Stativa E.B. Aspects of the Interpretation and Implementation of Expert’s Rights in the Appointment and Production of Forensic Construction and Technical Examination. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2020. Vol. 15. No. 2. P. 113–128. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2020-2-113-128

5. International Valuation Standards 2017 / Trans. from English. ed. by I.L. Artemenkov, S.A. Tabacova. Moscow: Rossiiskoe obshchestvo otsenshchikov, 2017. 168 p.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3