Sub-theory of Standardization of Forensic Activity in the General Theory of Forensic Science-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Sub-theory of Standardization of Forensic Activity in the General Theory of Forensic Science

Published:2021-07-30 Issue:2 Volume:16 Page:46-52
ISSN:2587-7275
Container-title:Theory and Practice of Forensic Science
language:
Short-container-title:Teor. prakt. sud. èkspert.

Author:

Chesnokova E. V.¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation; Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

Abstract

The article presents the main provisions of the sub-theory of standardization in the forensic expert activity, its place in the theoretical foundations of forensic expertology, and its relationship with other sub-theories of this science.The author defines the concepts of the subject, the object of the standardization sub-theory in forensic activity, highlights its specifics. The article emphasizes the favorable impact on the development of domestic standardization in forensic activities of foreign experience in the implementation of theoretical developments on standardization, including the formation of a hierarchy of its standards. It is shown that for the development of the sub-theory of standardization in forensic science, it is advisable to use the results of the introduction of standardization mechanisms in the practice of accredited forensic laboratories under the international standard GOST ISO/IEC 17025-2019 “General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories”, taking into account the theoretical foundations of forensic science.

Publisher

Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice (RFCFS)

Reference16 articles.

1. Ruzavin G.I. Scientific Theory: Logical and Methodological Analysis. Мoscow: Musl’, 1978. 244 p. (In Russ.).

2. Rossinskaya E.R., Galyashina E.I. & Zinin A.M. Forensic Science Theory (Forensic Expertology). 2nd ed. Moscow: Norma: INFRA-M. 2016. 368 p. (In Russ.).

3. Lebedev N.Yu., Chesnokova E.V. On Approaches to the Subject of Criminalistics and the Theory of Forensics (Forensic Expertology). Tomsk State University Journal of Law. 2020. No. 36. P. 70–82. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17223/22253513/36/7

4. Ustinova I.V. The Relevance of Spatial and Temporal Connections and Relationships for the Formation of a Subtheory of Forensic Forecasting. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2021. Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 54–58. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2021-1-54-585

5. Bebeshko G.I., Voytov S.A., Omel’yanyuk G.G., Usov A.I. Applying Bayesian Methods for Metro-logical Evaluation and Interpretation of Forensic Evidence. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2014. No. 1 (33). P. 148–158. (In Russ.).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. On the Issue of Environmental Forensic Subtheory;Theory and Practice of Forensic Science;2022-04-29