The Efficiency of a Head’s of a Forensic Organization Activity: Assessment Criteria, Conditions for Achieving and Correlation with the Goals of Forensic Activity

Author:

Surovaya O. A.1

Affiliation:

1. The Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation

Abstract

The article addresses the issues of the efficiency of forensic activity and its impact on the successful performance of forensic conduct. The author offers a systematic analysis of the processes of forming efficiency indicators for forensic activity and assessment criteria for a Head’s of a forensic organization activity. The paper also describes qualitative and quantitative indicators of the efficiency of a forensic organization when assessing the efficacy of a head’s performance, including by the efficiency indicators approved by the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation for forensic institutions of the system of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation. The author analyzes the probabilities of the negative efficiency of a head’s activity and its impact on expert conduct. The article determines the trends of the further research of the issues of improving the efficacy of forensic organizations’ activities by forming new criteria for assessing a forensic organization head’s performance influencing the quality of forensic conduct.

Publisher

Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice (RFCFS)

Reference13 articles.

1. Tereshchenko N.G. Performance of Manager’s Activity in Experts’ Opinions. Koncept. 2014. Vol. 20. P. 2076–2080. (In Russ.). http://e-koncept.ru/2014/54679.htm

2. Kapoguzov E.A., Suleimenova G.K. Performance Evaluation of Government Agencies in the Context of Strategic Management and Organizational Development in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Ars Administrandi. 2017. Vol. 9. No. 3. P. 147–170. (In Russ.).

3. Shchukina T.V. International Standards and Internationsl Practice of Implementation of an Assessment In: Zhukovskaya N.Yu., Kalinina E.V. (eds). Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference “International Law and the Modern World” (Lipetsk, March 25, 2016). [Lipetsk State Pedagogical University named after P. P. Semenov-Tyan-Shansky], 2016. P. 174–182. (In Russ.).

4. Bagryanskaya P.D. Efficiency of Civil Procedure: Comparative Study. Legislation. 2020. No. 11. P. 50–55. (In Russ.).

5. Andrews N. The Three Paths of Justice. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice. Vol. 65. Springer, 2018. 344 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74832-0

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3