The Expert Initiative Right from a Perspective of Legal Hermeneutics

Author:

Boitsov A. A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Russian Ministry of Justice; Moscow City Pedagogical University

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of one of the rights forming the procedural status of a forensic expert, that is the right of expert initiative. The right is considered not only from a procedural point of view, but also in the context of professional, moral and ethical standards that should guide a forensic expert in his activities. The right of expert initiative is considered as a professional responsibility of an expert. From the perspective of legal hermeneutics an attempt is made to identify its direct recipient and more importantly - the form of realization of this right by the expert. The norm in question is examined within the context of regulatory legal acts and in this connection, we try to understand the content of this norm considering the basic principle of forensic expert activity - the objectivity principle and the complementary principles of comprehensiveness and completeness of a research. The question is raised of the mandatory nature of the norm for the expert regardless of the procedural form of its implementation.

Publisher

Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice (RFCFS)

Reference35 articles.

1. Efremova N.N. Legal Dialogue and Justice in a Context of History of the Russian Justice. State and Law. 2011. No. 10. P. 85–94. (In Russ.)

2. Hmyz A.I. To a Question about Expert Prevention in the Production of Judicial Expertise. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2019. No. 1. P. 105–108. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24411/2073-0454-2019-10027

3. Nikitina I.E. Current Issues in Justice and Home Affairs Cooperation between EU Member States Pertaining to Forensic Services and Investigative Operations. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2017. Vol. 12. No. 3. P. 110– 118. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2017-12-3-110-118

4. Maiorova E.I. Peculiarities of Expert Preventive Inspection in the Process of Judicial Ecological Expertise. The Law and the State. 2018. No. 3–4 (80–81). P. 144–154. (In Russ.)

5. Belkin R.S. Forensics. Brief encyclopedia. Moscow: Great Russian Encyclopedia, 1993. 111 p. (In Russ.)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3