Propaganda as a Category in Forensic Text Analysis

Author:

Baranov Anatolii N.1,Parshin Pavel B.2

Affiliation:

1. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Vinogradov Institute).

2. Center for Global Problems, MGIMO University of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation; Moscow State Linguistic University.

Abstract

The category of propaganda is considered in the paper as a linguistically definable notion. It is demonstrated that being a legal term, this category is significantly influenced by the semantics of the word propaganda as a unit of the Russian literary language. Presented is an analysis of various definitions of propaganda in their historical evolution, from the earliest record of the word in Russian dictionaries to modern lexicographic definitions. Polysemy of the lexical unit “propaganda” is analyzed. Special focus is placed on differentiation of propaganda from other forms of persuasive communication, particularly from advertising, including its political variety. Analysis of the meaning and use of the word propaganda is proposed as a way to objectivize the intuitive labeling of various statements as propagandistic. Our analysis resulted in a list of key properties of propagandistic discourse to be taken into account in the investigation of suspected propaganda of extremism and terrorism, namely, the existence of: (1) a subject of propaganda; (2) an addressee of propaganda, (3) a set of relatively simple and consistent points (describing the desired state of affairs) and supporting arguments; (4) opposing evaluations of the desired situation and its negative alternatives; (5) recurrent and persistent realization of the aforementioned set of points or its fragments in the discourse, with identical of slightly modified argumentation; (6) multiple texts produced within a certain period of time (i.e. the period of a propagandistic campaign); and (7) a practical possibility for disseminating information among multiple people (addressees).

Publisher

Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice (RFCFS)

Reference18 articles.

1. Pocheptsov G.G. Communicative technologies of the twentieth century. Moscow: Refl- buk; Kiev: Vakler, 2000. 352 p. (In Russ.).

2. Ul’yanovskii A.V. Marketing communications. 28 tools of a millennium. Moscow: Eksmo, 2008. 832 p. (In Russ.).

3. Parshin P.B. I hear from the same: about contents and usage of a concept of manipulation. Computer linguistics and intellectual technologies. (Proceedings of International Conference “Dialogue 2003”, Protvino, 11-16 June, 2003) Moscow: Nauka, 2003. P. 1-5. URL: http://www. dialog-21 .ru/media/2675/parshin.pdf (accessed on 15.03.2016). (In Russ.).

4. Kara-Murza S.G. Manipulation with consciousness. Moscow: Eksmo, 2005. 832 p. (In Russ.).

5. Solovei V.D. Absolute weapon. Bases of a war of nerves and media manipulation. Moscow: Eksmo, 2016. - 320 p. (In Russ.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3