Nottingham Klavikula Skorunun Türk Populasyonunda Geçerliliği ve Doğrulanması-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Nottingham Klavikula Skorunun Türk Populasyonunda Geçerliliği ve Doğrulanması

Published:2023-06-21 Issue:1 Volume:7 Page:89-97
ISSN:2587-0319
Container-title:Acta Medica Alanya
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

GÜLCÜ Anıl^ORCID,DİRLİK Günbay¹^ORCID,ÇELİK Derya²^ORCID,KURT Emine Eda³^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Alanya Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi

2. İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ, FİZYOTERAPİ VE REHABİLİTASYON BÖLÜMÜ, FİZYOTERAPİ VE REHABİLİTASYON PR.

3. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Private Health Center, Alanya

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the validation and verification of the Nottingham Clavicle Score (NCS) in the Turkish population. Methods: Sixty-eight patients (12 females, 56 males; mean age: 37.1±13.3 years) who underwent surgery due to clavicle fracture or acromioclavicular separation were included in the study. The Turkish version of the NCS (NCS-Tr) was designed in accordance with the stages recommended by Beaton et al. Each patient completed the NCS-Tr twice at 7 to 10-day intervals to evaluate the test-retest reliability based on the interrater correlation coefficient, and Cronbach’s alpha was evaluated for internal consistency. Additionally, the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), Constant-Murley Score (CMS), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey tests were completed by each participant to assess the correlation with the NCS-Tr. Results: The main score of the NCS-Tr was 79.71 ± 20.37. The other mean scores of CMS, OSS, and DASH were 84.14 ± 21.47, 38.34 ± 12.43, and 17.84 ± 22.47 respectively. The translation and adaptation of the NCS-Tr for a Turkish context required no major cultural adaptation. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.933). Test-retest reproducibility was excellent (q=0.941, p<0.001). Conclusion: The NCS-Tr is a valid, reliable, shoulder-specific scale in the assessment of patient-reported outcome measures for the functional assessment of Turkish patients undergoing surgery due to clavicle fractures or acromioclavicular joint separation.

Publisher

Acta Medica Alanya

Subject

General Medicine

Reference15 articles.

1. 1. Lowry KJ, Brox WT, Naas PL, Tubb CC, Muschler GF, Dunn W. Musculoskeletal-based patient-reported outcome performance measures: Where have we been, where are we going. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019;27(13):e589-95. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00429

2. 2. Dawson J, Doll H, Fitzpatrick R, Jenkinson C, Carr AJ. The routine use of patient-reported outcome measures in healthcare settings. BMJ. 2010;340:c186. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c186.

3. 3. Charles ER, Kumar V, Blacknall J, Edwards K, Geoghegan JM, Manning PA, et al. A validation of the Nottingham Clavicle Score: a clavicle, acromioclavicular joint and sternoclavicular joint-specific patient-reported outcome measure. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017;26(10):1732-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.03.036.

4. 4. Van der Linde JA, van Kampen DA, van Beers LW, van Deurzen DF, Terwee CB, Willems WJ. The Oxford Shoulder Instability Score; validation in Dutch and first-time assessment of its smallest detectable change. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015;10:146. doi: 10.1186/s13018-015-0286-5.

5. 5. Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Andersson B, Dahlgren E, Johansson A. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Swedish version evaluated in 176 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71(6):613-8. doi: 10.1080/000164700317362262.