Affiliation:
1. Center for Digital Antiquity
Abstract
Archaeology in the United States is conducted by a number of different sorts of entities under a variety of legal mandates that lack uniform standards for data archiving. The difficulty of accessing data from projects in which one was not directly involved indicates an apparent reluctance to archive raw data and supplemental information with digital repositories to be reused in the future. There is hope that additional legislation, guidelines from professional organisations, and educational efforts will change these practices.
Publisher
Council for British Archaeology
Reference38 articles.
1. Advisory Council on Historic Preservation 2018 Section 106 Archaeology Guidance, Washington, D.C. [Website] https://www.achp.gov/Protecting-Historic-Properties/Section_106_Archaeology_Guidance [Last accessed: 7 October 2020].
2. Agbe-Davies, A.S., Galle, J.E., Hauser, M.W. and Neiman, F.D. 2014 'Teaching with digital archaeological data: a research archive in the university classroom', Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 21, 837-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-013-9178-3
3. Bates, L.A., Bollwerk, E.A., Galle, J.E. and Neiman, F.D. 2020 'Archaeological data in the cloud: collaboration and accessibility with the digital archaeological archive of comparative slavery (DAACS)' in J. Crowder, M. Fortun, R. Besara and L. Poirier (eds) Anthropological Data in the Digital Age, Springer. 85-107. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24925-0_5
4. Boeckhout, M., Zielhuis, G.A. and Bredenoord, A.L. 2018 'The fair guiding principles for data stewardship: Fair enough?', European Journal of Human Genetics 26, 931. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-018-0160-0
5. Congressional Research Service 2020 Federal Land Ownership: Overview and data, United State Congress, Service, C.R., Washington, D.C.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献