Archaeological Research 2014 to 2021: an examination of its intellectual base, collaborative networks and conceptual language using science maps

Author:

Sinclair AnthonyORCID,

Abstract

A series of six science maps have been created visualising the shape of archaeological research between 2014 and 2021, using metadata from more than 50,000 academic documents. These maps present the intellectual base of the discipline as co-citation networks of sources and of authors, the language of archaeological research as both terms extracted from titles and abstracts and as author keywords, and, lastly, the networks of collaboration created by co-authorship between individuals and institutions. Comparison is made between 2014-2021 and an earlier study examining archaeological research between 2004 and 2013. Archaeology is revealed as a consistently broad and developing subject drawing extensively on methods and approaches from the sciences, social sciences, arts and humanities. It is intrinsically international in practice. Archaeological research is growing at a rate faster than the average for academic research. While there has been progress towards a more diverse community of researchers among those most highly cited, there remain significant issues in the observable diversity between different research areas within the same discipline and sometimes between similar research specialties. Classifications of archaeology by external bodies fail to grasp this diversity of archaeological research. Finally, diversity in terms variants suggests that there is a pressing need for the discipline to take control of its terminology.

Publisher

Council for British Archaeology

Subject

Archeology,Archeology

Reference98 articles.

1. Accomazzi, A., Gray, N., Erdmann, C., Biemesderfer, C., Frey, K. and Soles, J. 2014 'The Unified Astronomy Thesaurus', Proceedings of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.6656

2. Aitchison, K., Green, P. and Rocks-MacQueen, D., 2020. Profiling the Profession 2020. Landward Research Ltd. Available at: https://profilingtheprofession.org.uk/profiling-the-profession-2020-introduction/. [Last accessed: 24 April 2022].

3. American Psychological Association 1994 Thesaurus of Psychological Index Terms. 20th Anniversary 1974-1994, 7th Edition, Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

4. American Psychological Association 2005 Thesaurus of Psychological Index Terms. 30th Anniversary 1974-2004, 10th Edition, Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

5. Aria, M. and Cuccurullo, C. 2017 'Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis', Journal of Informetrics 11, 959-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3