Affiliation:
1. Bournemouth University
Abstract
This article presents an approach to guide the planning, development and evaluation of community archaeology. This will assist practitioners of all forms of community archaeology by providing a pathway to ethical practice that will benefit all. The approach focuses attention on four elements that are integral to community archaeology and which should always be considered: Who (the people involved); Why (their motivation); the Archaeology (in the broadest sense, including research questions and research methods); and How (the specific format the community engagement will take). This framework is applied to three case study community archaeology projects in Dorset, England, in order to demonstrate challenging examples of planned and reflexive community archaeology.
Funder
National Lottery Heritage Fund
Publisher
Council for British Archaeology
Reference60 articles.
1. Aitchison, K. and Rocks-Macqueen, D. 2013 Archaeology Labour Market Intelligence: Profiling the Profession 2012-13, Sheffield: Landward Research. https://www.landward.eu/2013/10/archaeology-labour-market-intelligence-profiling-the-profession-2012-13.html [Last accessed: 21 May 2020].
2. Arnstein, S.R. 1969 'A ladder of citizen participation', Journal of American Institute of Planners 35(4), 216-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
3. Atalay, S. 2012 Community-Based Archaeology: Research with, by, and for Indigenous and Local Communities, Berkeley: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520953468
4. Belford, P. 2011 'Archaeology, community, and identity in an English New Town', Historic Environment-Policy and Practice 2(1), 49-67. https://doi.org/10.1179/175675011X12943261434602
5. Belford, P. 2014 'Sustainability in community archaeology,' Online Journal in Public Archaeology, Special volume, 21-44. https://doi.org/10.23914/ap.v4i2.58
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献