METHODS MATTER: LEARNING FROM INSTITUTIONAL ETHNOGRAPHY AND INTERSECTIONALITY TO INFORM INTERVIEW RESEARCH METHODS FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE IN STEM EDUCATION

Author:

Wright Casey E.

Abstract

In this methodological paper, I share methodological developments within an institutional ethnography (IE) guided by intersectionality. I argue both theories and methods that address how institutions operate through discourses of gender, race, and class inequity, which need to be used to guide interview research for pursuing equity in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education. Drawing on a political commitment to social justice foundational to intersectionality to guide the work, I detail methodological development for interview-based STEM social justice research. I describe how I developed interview methods on entry-level data by drawing on tools of storytelling, a post-interview reflection guide, and the Listening Guide. I reflect on how I adapted these tools for use in an IE to investigate the experiences of women who were parenting while pursuing STEMPhDs. Developing methods with theory was found to be generative for examining researcher and participant relationships, as was drawing on narrative approaches for greater examination of these relationships. Rather than presenting the work as settled, this paper grapples with the commitment and self-reflection needed in interpretative research with a social justice aim. Implications are shared for early career researchers and others who are interested in interview research for equity in STEM education.

Publisher

Begell House

Subject

Engineering (miscellaneous),Gender Studies

Reference81 articles.

1. Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender and Society, 20(4), 441-464. DOI: 10.1177/0891243206289499

2. Banerjee, D., & Pawley, A. L. (2013). Gender and promotion: How do science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) faculty members survive a foggy climate? Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 19(4), 329-347. DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2013004654

3. Bhattacharya, K. (2007). Consenting to the consent form: What are the fixed and fluid understandings between the researcher and the researched? Qualitative Inquiry, 13(8), 1095-1115. DOI: 10.1177/1077800407304421

4. Brown, A. M. (2020). We will not cancel us: And other dreams of transformative justice. Chico, CA: AK Press. Retrieved January 31, 2022, from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/purdue/detail.action?docID=6313697.

5. Bullock, E. C. (2013). Conducting 'good' equity research in mathematics education: A question of methodology. Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College, 3(2), 30-36. DOI: 10.7916/jmetc. v3i2.752

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3