Clinicopathologic Features and Prognostic Significance of Immunohistochemistry and In Situ Hybridization Based Molecular Classification in Gastric Carcinoma
-
Published:2023
Issue:4
Volume:42
Page:1-14
-
ISSN:0731-8898
-
Container-title:Journal of Environmental Pathology, Toxicology and Oncology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol
Author:
Issin Gizem,Sayar İlyas,Demir Fatih,Bakkaloğlu İrem Güvendir,Gamsizkan Mehmet,Yildiz Zeliha,Yilmaz Ismail,Özmen Sevilay Akalp,Çağatay Diren Vuslat,Zemheri Itır Ebru,Demiriz Murat,Günal Armağan
Abstract
<b>Background/Aim:</b> Gastric carcinoma (GC) is a highly heterogeneous disease with many subtypes that have different morphologic and molecular characteristics. In the current study, we analyzed immunohistochemical (IHC) and <i>in situ</i> hybridization (ISH) features of GCs and evaluated their association with prognosis and clinicopathological features.
<b>Materials and Methods: </b>Three hundred cases analyzed by IHC and ISH for microsatellite stability, p53, e-cadherin, HER2, PD-L1 expression, and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) status. Cases were classified into five subgroups based on expression profile. The relationships between subgroups, clinicopathological features, and survival were determined.
<b> Results:</b> Ten (3.3%) cases were classified as EBV<sup>-</sup>associated, 45 (15%) as microsatellite instable (MSI), 73 (24.3%) as EBV<sup>-</sup>/microsatellite-stable (MSS)/epithelial-mesenchymal-transformation (EMT)-like, 75 (25%) as EBV<sup>-</sup>/MSS/ non-EMT-like/p53<sup>+</sup>, and 97 (32.3%) as EBV<sup>-</sup>/MSS/non-EMT-like/p53<sup>-</sup>. The MSI subtype had the best overall survival (OS). In contrast, the EBV-/MSS/EMT-like subtype had the poorest OS. The MSI subtype was also related with old age of the patient and antrum-corpus localized tumors, whereas the EBV<sup>-</sup>/MSS/EMT-like was associated with young age, larger tumor size, and advanced stage presentation. PD-L1 positivity is highly correlated with MSI and EBV-associated subtypes.
<b>Conclusion:</b> Our data demonstrated a link between IHC/ISH characteristics of GC and clinical outcomes. IHC/ISH based molecular classification may be helpful in predicting the survival.
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Toxicology,General Medicine,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference29 articles.
1. Lauren P. The two histological main types of gastric carcinoma: Diffuse and so-called intestinal-type carcinoma. An attempt at a histo-clinical classification. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1965;64:31-49. 2. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma. Nature. 2014;513(7517):202-9. 3. Cristescu R, Lee J, Nebozhyn M, Kim KM, Ting JC, Wong SS, Liu J, Yue YG, Wang J, Yu K, Ye XS, Do IG, Liu S, Gong L, Fu J, Jin JG, Choi MG, Sohn TS, Lee JH, Bae JM, Kim ST, Park SH, Sohn I, Jung SH, Tan P, Chen R, Hardwick J, Kang WK, Ayers M, Hongyue D, Reinhard C, Loboda A, Kim S, Aggarwal A. Molecular analysis of gastric cancer identifies subtypes associated with distinct clinical outcomes. Nat Med. 2015;21(5):449-56. 4. Setia N, Agoston AT, Han HS, Mullen JT, Duda DG, Clark JW, Deshpande V, Mino-Kenudson M, Srivastava A, Lennerz JK, Hong TS, Kwak EL, Lauwers GY. A protein and mRNA expression-based classification of gastric cancer. Mod Pathol. 2016;29(7):772-84. 5. Ahn S, Lee SJ, Kim Y, Kim A, Shin N, Choi KU, Lee CH, Huh GY, Kim KM, Setia N, Lauwers GY, Park DY. High-throughput protein and mRNA expression-based classification of gastric cancers can identify clinically distinct subtypes, Concordant with recent molecular classifications. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017;41(1):106-15.
|
|