SOLVING HIGH-DIMENSIONAL INVERSE PROBLEMS WITH AUXILIARY UNCERTAINTY VIA OPERATOR LEARNING WITH LIMITED DATA
-
Published:2023
Issue:2
Volume:4
Page:105-133
-
ISSN:2689-3967
-
Container-title:Journal of Machine Learning for Modeling and Computing
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Mach Learn Model Comput
Author:
Hart Joseph,Gulian Mamikon,Manickam I.,Swiler Laura P.
Abstract
In complex large-scale systems such as climate, important effects are caused by a combination of confounding processes that are not fully observable. The identification of sources from observations of the system state is vital for attribution and prediction, which inform critical policy decisions. The difficulty of these types of inverse problems lies in the inability to isolate sources and the cost of simulating computational models. Surrogate models may enable the many-query algorithms required for source identification, but data challenges arise from high dimensionality of the state and source, limited ensembles of costly model simulations to train a surrogate model, and few and potentially noisy state observations for inversion due to measurement limitations. The influence of auxiliary processes adds an additional layer of uncertainty that further confounds source identification. We introduce a framework based on (1) calibrating deep neural network surrogates to the flow maps provided by an ensemble of simulations obtained by varying sources, and (2) using these surrogates in a Bayesian framework to identify sources from observations via optimization. Focusing on an atmospheric dispersion exemplar, we find that the expressive and computationally efficient nature of the deep neural network operator surrogates in appropriately reduced dimension allows for source identification with uncertainty quantification using limited data. Introducing a variable wind field as an auxiliary process, we find that a Bayesian approximation error approach is essential for reliable source inversion when uncertainty due to wind stresses the algorithm.
Reference58 articles.
1. Arias, P., Bellouin, N., Coppola, E., Jones, R., Krinner, G., Marotzke, J., Naik, V., Palmer, M., Plattner, G.K., Rogelj, J., et al., Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2. Technical Summary, The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change AR6, V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S. Conners, C. Pean, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J. Matthews, T. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yeleki, R. Yu, and B. Zhou, Eds., accessed from https://elib.dlr.de/137584/ pp. 1-40, 2021. 3. Arridge, S.R., Kaipio, J.P., Kolehmainen, V., Schweiger, M., Somersalo, E., Tarvainen, T., and Vauhkonen, M., Approximation Errors and Model Reduction with an Application in Optical Diffusion Tomography, Inverse Probl., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 175-195, 2006. 4. Asch, M., A Toolbox for Digital Twins: From Model-Based to Data-Driven, Philadelphia, PA: SIAM, 2022. 5. Barnett, J. and Farhat, C., Quadratic Approximation Manifold for Mitigating the Kolmogorov Barrier in Nonlinear Projection-Based Model Order Reduction, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 464, p. 111348, 2022.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|