FLOW AND HEAT-TRANSFER CHARACTERISTICS IN SMALL-DIAMETER TUBE BUNDLES WITH A STAGGERED LAYOUT: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY
-
Published:2024
Issue:5
Volume:31
Page:33-52
-
ISSN:1065-5131
-
Container-title:Journal of Enhanced Heat Transfer
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Enh Heat Transf
Author:
Qi Han,Xu Guoqiang,Liu Weitong,Zhang Lina,Fu Yanchen
Abstract
While past research has primarily focused on heat transfer in larger diameter tubes, the capabilities of small-diameter tubes have often been estimated using correction factors. However, with the evolution of compact heat exchangers, conducting dedicated studies on small-diameter tube bundles has become increasingly crucial to achieve more precise conclusions. An experimental research on flow and heat-transfer characteristics of staggered tube bundles with different tube diameters (2, 3, and 5 mm) is conducted. In the experiment, the number of rows (4-12), the mass rate of the air (0.06-0.18 kg/s), and the transverse tube pitch (<i>S</i><sub>1</sub>/<i>d</i> = 2, <i>S</i><sub>1</sub>/<i>d</i> = 3) are variables to study the characteristics of the airside flow resistance and heat transfer. The three main conclusions of the experimental results are as follows: (1) Under the same conditions, the smaller tube diameter leads to the larger airside convective heat-transfer coefficient. Besides, the deviation between the Nusselt number of the experiment and the empirical correlation of Žukauskas is in the range between -14 and -10%; (2) The effect of transverse distance on heat transfer is not obvious, but the convective heat-transfer coefficient increases significantly with the increase of row number; (3) The external pressure drop of the tube exhibits an exponential increase with the air-flow rate. Particularly in the experimental samples with smaller diameters, the outflow resistance of the tube is noticeably higher compared to other tubes. Finally, new empirical correlations of the airside convection heat transfer for the small-diameter staggered tube bundles are fitted according to the experimental data, and it is hoped to provide a reference for the more accurate design of tube-bundle heat exchangers.
Reference38 articles.
1. Bacellar, D., Aute, V., Huang, Z., and Radermacher, R., Airside Friction and Heat Transfer Characteristics for Staggered Tube Bundle in Crossflow Configuration with Diameters from 0.5 mm to 2.0 mm, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 98, pp. 448-454, 2016. 2. Bacellar, D., Aute, V., and Radermacher, R., CFD-Based Correlation Development for Air Side Performance of Finned and Finless Tube Heat Exchangers with Small Diameter Tubes, in 15th Int. Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conf., West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University, p. 2240, 2014. 3. Bich, W., Cox, M.G., Dybkaer, R., Elster, C., Estler, W.T., Hibbert, B., Imai, H., Kool, W., Michotte, C., and Nielsen, L., Revision of the 'Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement', Metrologia, vol. 49, p. 702, 2012. 4. Bruening, G.B. and Chang, W.S., Cooled Cooling Air Systems for Turbine Thermal Management, Proc. of the ASME 1999 Int. Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exhibition, vol. 78606, p. V003T01A002, 1999. 5. Chang, N.-C., Li, C.-J., and Wang, C.-C., Performance of Bare-Tube Bundle Having Small Diameter Tube: With and Without Partial Bypass, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 67, pp. 73-80, 2015.
|
|