1. Ansal, A., Durukal, E. & Tönük, G. (2006) "Selection Development Goals., Paper No. 128. and Scaling of Real Acceleration Time Histories for D'Ayala, D. & Ansal, A. (2012) Non linear push over Site Response Analyses", Proc. of ETC12 Workshop, assessment of heritage buildings in Istanbul to define Athens, Greece. seismic risk. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering; Feb
2. Ansal, A., Tönük, G., Demircioglu, M., Bayrakli, 2012, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p. 285. Y., Sesetyan, K. & Erdik, M. (2006) "Ground Directive of the PCM 12 October 2007 (2007) Evalu-Motion Parameters for Vulnerability Assessment", ation andReduction of Seismic Risk of Cultural Proceedings of the First European Conference on Heritage with reference to the Technical Standard for Construction (in Italian) G.U.R.I. n. 24, 9 ISMEP (2008) Inventorization and Multi-Hazard and2008. Earthquake Performance Evaluation of the Cultural
3. Durukal, E., Ansal, A. & Tönük, G. (2005) "Effect Heritage Buildings in Istanbul, Istanbul Seismic Risk of Ground Motion Scaling in Site Response Mitigation And Emergency Preparedness Project Analyses", Proceedings of the Earthquake Geotechni- Reports, Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Culture cal Engineering Satellite Conference, 16th ICSMGE, and Tourism, Istanbul Directorate of Surveying and Osaka, Japan. Monuments.
4. Erdik, M. & Fahjan, Y. (2006) Damage Scenarios and ods", Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. On Microzonation, Seattle, Damage Evaluation, Assessing and Managing Earth- 3:1319-1330. quake Risk Geo-scientific and Engineering Knowledge Iyisan, R. (1996) "Correlations between Shear Wave for Earthquake Risk Mitigation: developments, tools, Velocity and In-situ Penetration Test Results", Techtechniques, Ch.10, Book Series: Geotechnical, Geo- nical Journal of Turkish Chamber of Civil Engineers, logical, and Earthquake Engineering, Eds: Oliveira 7(2),1187-1199 (in Turkish). CS, Roca A, Goula X (Eds.). Menq, F.Y., Stokoe, K.H. & Kavazanjian, E. (2003)