K politickému liberalizmu Johna Rawlsa: Perspektivy a úskalí v současném občansko-politickém diskurze

Author:

Horemuž MartinORCID,Švec JakubORCID

Abstract

Except to the Theory of Justice from 1971, which fundamentally changed the view of pluralist democracies with a market system on the welfare state and redistribution, John Rawls was also responsible for another application of philosophical doctrine to political practice by the form of the idea of political liberalism. This approach, as in the case of the „Theory of Justice“, was to once again solve the fundamental dilemma of democratic and pluralist societies built on the value basis of liberal tradition and market economy, how to approach opinion opponents who hold other ideological attitudes, which operate in democratic frameworks. In the presented text, we tried for an objective definition of John Rawls's political liberalism, while the study had the ambition to analyze the perspectives and pitfalls of this concept for the contemporary civil-political discourse. For the purpose of the presented study, we chose the method of analysis of the author's original work as well as secondary literature. Subsequently, we synthesized the obtained partial findings into statements and knowledge of new quality. The study demonstrated that, similar to the author's work „Theory of Justice“, this concept of the author in the form of „Political Liberalism“ is workable and applicable in civil-political practice. However, the text also works with the idea, that this approach is currently accepted rather formally, and the idea of political liberalism necessarily runs into the problem of gradual preference of liberal conceptions of the good life. By referring to authors from domestic and also foreign philosophical communities, the text demonstrated the international and interdisciplinary scope of the problem, which extends into the broad field of humanities and social sciences..

Publisher

Matej Bel University in Banska Bystrica

Reference18 articles.

1. BERLIN, I. 1958. Dva pojmy slobody. In: GÁL, E., NOVOSÁD, F. (eds.). O slobode a spravodlivosti. Bratislava: Archa, 1993. s. 19 - 73. ISBN 80-7115-047-9.

2. CÍBIK, M. 2017. Liberáli a tí druhí. Bratislava: AKAmedia, 2017. 143 s. ISBN: 978-80-972769-0-4.

3. FANTON, M. 2020. Rawls's Point of View: A Systematic Reading of Justice as Fairness. In: Brazilian Political Science Review, roč. 14, 2020, č. 2, e-ISSN: 1981-3821, s. 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821202000020003

4. HIRUTA, K. 2021. Hannah Arendt and Isaiah Berlin. Princeton: Princton Unviersity Press, 2021. 277 s. ISBN: 978-0-691-18226-1

5. KAHN, L. 2012. Mill on Justice. Londýn: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. 224 s. ISBN: 978-1-349-36681-1.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3