The Scottish Parliamentary Elections and the Transformation of Electoral Behaviour

Author:

Skutilová MarieORCID

Abstract

The rise of the decentralisation or devolution reforms in Europe in the past decades brought scholars' attention to the voting behaviour in multi-level electoral systems. Some types of elections, such as local or regional, might be considered less important for voters than national ones. However, in some regions, the importance of the sub-state level of governance is rising, which might lead voters to change their perception of the regional elections. Since the beginning of the devolution in the UK, the Scottish parliament has become one of the most powerful regional parliaments in Europe. The study reviewed the main differences in electoral behaviour between general and regional elections in Scotland. The analysis used four aspects of the theoretical model of the second-order election. It focused on the turnout in both elections, the success of small and regional parties, the change of support for government and opposition parties and the main campaign topics. The results showed that the Scottish electoral behaviour went through a significant transformation at regional and state-wide level in the past two decades. The different electoral behaviour in regional elections was significantly influenced by the voting system that helped regional nationalist parties increase their support and become the main political force in the region that determines electoral competition. The transformation of electoral behaviour in the Scottish parliamentary election continued to the state-wide level. It determined that the regional elections, in the case of Scotland, cannot be perceived as less important and subordinated to the general elections.

Publisher

Matej Bel University in Banska Bystrica

Reference61 articles.

1. CAMPBELL, A. 1960. Surge and Decline: A Study of Electoral Change. In Public Opinion Quarterly. 24(3), 397-418. https://doi.org/10.1086/266960

2. CARRUBBA, C. - TIMPONE, R. J. 2005. Explaining Vote Switching Across First- and Second-Order Elections: Evidence from Europe. In Comparative Political Studies. 38(3), 260-281. ISSN 00104140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414004272693

3. DEACON, R. 2012. Devolution in the United Kingdom. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Politics study guides. ISBN 978-0-7486-4651-7.

4. DUVERGER, M. 2016. Politické strany. Praha: Univerzita Karlova v Praze, nakladatelství Karolinum. Politeia (Karolinum). ISBN 978-80-246-2568-3.

5. FIORINA, M. P. 1996. Divided Government. 2nd. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. ISBN 978-0321121844.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3