Exploring the Interplay of Pastureland Governance Degradation and Livelihood Vulnerability: A Study in Southern Rajasthan, India
-
Published:2024-06-01
Issue:
Volume:
Page:288-301
-
ISSN:2582-4295
-
Container-title:Journal of Rural Development
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:JRD
Author:
Bheel Fateh Lal,Jadhav Jagdish
Abstract
Pastureland in Rajasthan has a special significance for a range of reasons. The state has acute adverse biophysical and climatic conditions where income from agriculture is uncertain. As a result, most rural inhabitants make ends meet by raising livestock. This study attempts to understand the biophysical condition, governance of the pastureland, and its impact on the livelihood of the rural poor. It uses an exploratory research design to explore the key drivers of deteriorating pastureland. The study was conducted in 15 villages in southern Rajasthan spread across three districts: Bhilwara, Chittorgarh, and Pratapgarh. To fulfil the study objectives, Focus Group Discussions and individual interviews were conducted with community members and Gram Panchayat (Village Council) officials. The findings depict the dismal picture of pastureland governance at the grassroots level, resulting from multiple factors such as overgrazing, the ineffectiveness of protection rules, and encroachment. The study suggests that appropriate management and protection of the pastureland are urgently needed to sustain the rural community’s livestock and livelihood.
Publisher
National Institute of Rural Development and Panchayati Raj
Reference42 articles.
1. Alexandratos, N., & Bruinsma, J. (2012). World agriculture towards 2030/2050: The 2012 revision (ESA Working Papers). ESA Working Paper No. 12‐03, Agricultural Development Economics Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome. Retrieved December 24, 2022, from https://www.fao.org/3/ap106e/ap106e.pdf 2. Bala, R. (2013). Review Essay, Changing Scenario of Common Property Resources and the Role of Community in the Management of Common Property Resource. 3. Banerjee, A., Jhariya, M. K., Raj, A., Yadav, D. K., Khan, N., & Meena, R. S. (2021). Land footprint management and policies. In Agroecological footprints management for sustainable food system (pp. 221-246). Springer, Singapore. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-9496-0_7 4. Bekele, A. E., Drabik, D., Dries, L., & Heijman, W. (2022). Large-scale Land Investments and Land-Use Conflicts in the Agro-Pastoral Areas of Ethiopia. Land Use Policy, 119, 106166. 5. Bennett, E. M., Cramer, W., Begossi, A., Cundill, G., Díaz, S., Egoh, B. N., ... & Woodward, G. (2015). Linking Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services, and Human Well-being: Three Challenges for Designing Research for Sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 76-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.03.007
|
|