Affiliation:
1. St. Petersburg Military Order of Zhukov Institute of National Guard of the Russian Federation; National Research Nizhny Novgorod State University named after N. I. Lobachevsky
2. Novosibirsk Military Institute of the Order of Zhukov Army General I. K. Yakovlev of the troops of the National Guard of the Russian Federation
3. St. Petersburg Military Order of Zhukov Institute of National Guard of the Russian Federation; Novosibirsk Military Institute of the Order of Zhukov Army General I. K. Yakovlev of the troops of the National Guard of the Russian Federation; Russian State Social University Moscow
Abstract
Introduction. In the conditions of modernization of the education system, the problem of the formation of personality resistance in the educational environment becomes relevant. On the basis of domestic research on the psychology of the environment, an analysis was made of the characteristics, criteria, conditions, approaches to the requirements for the modern educational environment, which will contribute to the formation of psychological determinants of personality resistance. The formation of personal resistance in the educational environment is possible in an innovative personality-developing environment, which should be psychologically safe, humanitarian - based on humanistic and moral values. A system of psychological support is presented, which is based on the principles of trust, using a polysubjective approach. The analysis and comparison of the results of the ascertaining and forming experiment was carried out in order to determine the effectiveness of the activity of the personality-developing environment on a group of students of 1-2 courses of the socionomic profile. Materials and Methods. The work used a diagnostic complex, which makes it possible to determine the component structure in order to study the manifestation of personality resistance in the subjects, and also carried out a meaningful analysis and comparison of the results of the ascertaining and forming experiment with the aim of the effectiveness of the program of the forming experiment. Results. As a result of the implementation of the formative program, students are dominated by a high level of development of all components of the psychological structure of resistance, which is characterized by a wide range of knowledge about behavior strategies in various situations. A tendency was found to increase the choice of terminal values in comparison with instrumental ones. A more detailed analysis showed that among the terminal values among the groups of subjects, the indicators of long-term goals, which ensure self-development and predicting behavior strategies in various situations, increased. According to the analysis of the content characteristics of instrumental values, the following can be noted: the students' indicators for ethical and business values increased, as well as the indicators for self-affirmation values and, which is especially interesting, for altruistic values. All this, in our opinion, testifies to the assimilation of a wide range of social actions by all subjects in the process of practice (especially in volunteer activities). In the group of students, the values of business and the values of self-affirmation prevail, the values of communication are much less pronounced. It should also be noted that altruistic values are quite clearly represented among students, which indicates an increase in the stability of the individual. An interesting fact, from the point of view of our study, is the lack of individualistic and conformist values among students. It should be noted that the personal position of the subjects has changed significantly in terms of deepening subjectivity, more balanced indicators are observed. Discussion and Conclusions. The study was aimed at testing the system of psychological support in the process of formation of resistance as a personality trait in the subjects – students showed its effectiveness. As a result of the implementation of the formative program, a high level of development of the presented components of the psychological structure of resistance prevails.
Reference36 articles.
1. Baeva I. A. Psychological safety in education. St. Petersburg, SOYUZ Publ., 2002. 271 p. (In Russ.)
2. Baeva I. A., Volkova E. N., Gayazova L. A., Ibragimova A. G., Laktionova E. B., Yudin N. V. Security psychology as a basis for humanitarian technologies in social interaction. St. Petersburg, OOO «Knizhnyj Dom» Publ., 2008. 288 p. (In Russ.)
3. Belinskaya E. P. Coping with difficulties in the era of uncertainty and global risks: main research trends. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2022, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 760-771. (In Russ.)
4. Bozhovich L. I. Personality and its formation in childhood. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2008. 400 p. (In Russ.)
5. Vachkov I. V. Polysubject interaction in the educational environment. Zhjurnal Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki. Psihologiya, 2014, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 36-50. (In Russ.)
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献