How an almost absent correlation becomes «meaningful» and the research is effective

Author:

Basimov M. M.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Autonomous non-profit organization of higher education «Zhirinovsky University of World Civilizations»

Abstract

Introduction. The analysis of statistical relationships between the studied characteristics is found in almost any dissertation psychological research, so the problem of traditional errors in interpreting the results of correlation analysis becomes extremely relevant. This is manifested in the fact that the concepts of “strength of connection” and its “significance” are in no way related to each other, and the strength of the connection is considered regardless of the size of the sample. All this leads to either considering “significant”, but at the same time very weak and weak correlations, as results worthy of attention, or to considering strong correlations for small samples. It becomes necessary when analyzing the results of correlation analysis to take into account both the strength of the connection and its “significance”, so that only connections that are objectively worthy of attention when describing the results of the study remain.Materials and Methods. Tables of critical values of the Pearson (Spearman) correlation coefficient for three significance levels (0.05, 0.01, 0.0001). Transformation of the intervals of the correlation coefficient by the strength of the relationship, taking into account the significance and size of the sample.Results. The article provides a detailed analysis of literary sources on statistics with a demonstration of the problems of interpreting the results of correlation analysis. An attempt is made to objectively estimate the correlation coefficient, taking into account independent characteristics: the absolute value of the correlation coefficient, the significance level and the sample size, which must be considered simultaneously, without ignoring any of them. A sample of 150 objects is taken as some ideal for interpreting the values of the correlation coefficients in the framework of the classification by the strength of the connection. In order for users to have a single rule for interpreting the absolute value of the correlation coefficient, the article provides tables for users of the transformed correlation strength intervals at significance levels of 0.05, 0.01, 0.001 for different sample sizes. The problems under consideration are discussed on the example of two dissertation studies, when the authors follow the rules for interpreting the results of correlation analysis set out in the educational literature and offer very strange interpretations in the framework of their research.Discussion and Conclusions. The proposed scheme for interpreting the results of correlation analysis both in terms of strength and significance makes it possible to describe statistical relationships much more objectively when the strength of the relationship is considered with reference to the sample size. This prevents numerous interpretive errors that occur when unilaterally interpreting the results of correlation analysis either by the strength of the relationship or by the level of significance, when numerous results of psychological research in articles and dissertations are very doubtful within the linear paradigm.

Publisher

Minin University

Subject

General Medicine

Reference37 articles.

1. Basimov M. M. Models of gross typical errors of correlation cognition of complex psychological reality. Uchenye zapiski Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo social'nogo universiteta, 2017, vol. 16, no. 4 (143), pp. 5-19. (In Russ.)

2. Basimov M. M. Typical models of psychological processes and their erroneous interpretations through “significant” correlations. Uchenye zapiski Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo social'nogo universiteta, 2017, vol. 16, no. 3 (142), pp. 6-18. (In Russ.)

3. Gadzhigasanova N. S. Methods of applied statistics for sociologists. Yaroslavl, YArGU Publ., 2013. (In Russ.)

4. Glass Dzh., Stenli Dzh. Statistical methods in pedagogy and psychology. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1976. (In Russ.)

5. Davidenko A. A. Psychological and pedagogical conditions for the development of non-linear thinking of the teacher: the dissertation of the candidate of psychological sciences: 19.00.07. Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, 2016. (In Russ.)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3