Affiliation:
1. Minin Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University (Minin University)
Abstract
Introduction: the problem of diagnostics of the quality of education at a higher education institution is becoming increasingly relevant in the conditions of the need to fulfill the criteria for the effectiveness of higher education institutions, the introduction of new generation standards in higher education institutions and the modernization of the educational program management system. Diagnostics of the quality of education is considered as an important process that ensures a steady position of the university in the educational services market, the growth of indicators for the admission campaign, the increase of reputational capital. Diagnostics of the quality of education makes it possible to identify significant factors in determining the prospects for the development of a university, having a significant impact on the performance indicators of a university and characterizing the results achieved and the resources used.Materials and Methods:the article discusses the system for the quality of education evaluation at Minin University, it describes its key components, reveals the elements of the diagnostic complex and their systemic interconnection. The characteristics of the elements of the diagnostic complex describes in detail the issue of improving the efficiency of the university in terms of the implementation of the management model of the main professional educational programs, the description of the diagnostic procedure for each category of participants in the educational process is presented.Results:the author describes the methodology and the main stages of diagnosing the quality of education at the university using the example of Minin University, gives integrated assessment criteria and their relationship with other elements of the monitoring system and evaluating the quality of education at the university, lists the effects of introducing a comprehensive system for diagnosing the quality of educational activities.Discussion and Conclusions:in the final part of the article, the possibilities of further improving the system of assessment of the quality of education in the educational system of higher education are considered. Arguments about the need to further expand the range of issues raised by the diagnostic process are made; the ratio of the existing positions of the university to the requirements of the legislation is made.
Reference52 articles.
1. Alekseeva L.P., SHablygina N.S., Ageeva L.N. Improving the qualifications of university teachers in Russia in the context of higher education reform. Moscow, 2002. 48 p. (Content, forms and methods of teaching in higher education: Analytical reviews on the main directions of development of higher education) / NIIWO; Issue 9). (In Russ.)
2. Bolotov V.A. On the construction of a nationwide system for assessing the quality of education. Voprosy obrazovaniya, 2005, no. 1, pp. 5-10. (In Russ.)
3. Bordovskaya N.V., Titova E.V. Methods of assessing the quality of activities of university teachers: guidelines. St. Petersburg, Arkhangelsk, 2003. 72 p. (In Russ.)
4. Bordovskij G.A., Nesterov A.A., Trapicyn S.YU. Quality management of the educational process. St. Petersburg, Publisher RGPU named after A.I. Herzen, 2001. 359 p. (In Russ.)
5. Vishtak O.V. Motivational preferences of applicants and students. Socis, 2003, no. 2, pp. 135-138. (In Russ.)
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献