Author:
Chan Winnie Wai-Ying,Fu Siu-Ngor,Zheng Yong-Ping,Parent Eric C.,Cheung Jason P. Y.,Zheng Daniel K. Y.,Wong Arnold Y. L.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To summarize the development and validation of machine learning (ML) models using data from the first clinical visit to predict ensuing curve progression in individuals with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. DESIGN: Systematic review. LITERATURE SEARCH: Five databases were searched from inception to March 31, 2023. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies had to include teenagers (10-17 years) with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and internally/externally validated ML models for predicting curve progression. DATA SYNTHESIS: We used the Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS) to guide data extraction, the International Journal of Medical Informatics (IJMEDI) checklist for quality assessments, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system for evidence certainty. RESULTS: Seventeen studies with 37 ML models (3701 participants) were included. The models predicted risk, threshold progression, Cobb angles, and curve variations. The IJMEDI checklist identified critical shortcomings in data understanding (60%), preparation (82%), validation (95%), and deployment (95%). Thirty-four ML models showed fair to excellent accuracy, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranging from 0.70 to 0.93 in most categories. CONCLUSION: While most models achieved moderate to good accuracy, the certainty of evidence was very low, rendering most models not clinically deployable and lacking external validation. Therefore, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Future research should address these limitations to improve the clinical applicability and external validity. JOSPT Open 2024;2(3):202-224. Epub 17 April 2024. doi:10.2519/josptopen.2024.0718
Publisher
Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy (JOSPT)