Three Distinct Step Count Trajectories Identified at 3-Months After Total Knee Replacement: An Exploratory Cohort Study

Author:

Duong Vicky,Dennis Simone,Ferreira Manuela L.,Nicolson Philippa J.A.,Robbins Sarah R.,Venkatesha Venkatesha,Wang Xia,Hunter David J.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if participants demonstrate distinct trajectories of step count following total knee replacement, and whether their baseline characteristics differ. DESIGN: Longitudinal repeated measures study within a randomized-controlled trial. METHODS: Participants were recruited from 3 hospitals in Sydney, Australia. Only participant data from the intervention group were used for this study (n = 51). Baseline data including demographics, pain (0-10 numerical rating scale), 13-item Patient Activation Measure scale, and modified Computer Self-efficacy Scale were collected. Participants received an activity tracker to monitor daily step counts. Latent class analyses were used to identify distinct trajectories of step count from baseline to 3-month follow-up. Baseline characteristics were compared using multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: 43 participants were included in the analysis. Participants were predominantly female (n = 30, 70%) with an average age (SD) of 67.7 (7.5) years and body mass index (SD) of 30.3 (6.0). Three distinct step count trajectories were identified: a “high and rapidly increasing” group (n = 6, 14%), who began at 6251 ± 3508 steps and achieved 12794 ± 3173 steps by weeks 9 to 11; a “low and gradually increasing” (n = 24, 56%), (baseline: 2843 ± 1058 steps, 12 weeks: 6441 ± 1677 steps) ; and “high and gradually increasing” (n = 13, 30%), (baseline: 6299 ± 1777 steps, 12 weeks: 9614 ± 1436 steps). At baseline, body mass index and pain significantly differed between groups. CONCLUSION: Three distinct step count trajectories were found in people with total knee replacement. Findings highlight the variability between patient groups and the need for support for those who may not be reaching prescribed step goals. JOSPT Open 2023;1(1):78-85. Epub 11 August 2023. doi:10.2519/josptopen.2023.0011

Publisher

Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy (JOSPT)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3