Content and Thematic Analysis Techniques in Qualitative Research: Purpose, Process and Features

Author:

ÖZDEN MuhammetORCID

Abstract

It has been observed that qualitative research methodologies are increasingly used in educational research. However, many errors can occur in qualitative research at various stages, from planning the study to collecting data, from selecting participants to writing the findings. One of the processes where novice qualitative researchers experience the most problems is data analysis. At this stage, researchers often do not know how to structure and code the data, and they lack confidence in their knowledge and skills regarding the processes of developing categories and themes. Another significant issue for researchers is their inability to understand the purposes and usage of the techniques applied in qualitative data analysis. It is even observed that in some studies, the processes of one analysis technique are replaced with those of another technique with similar characteristics. The continued increase of these problems negatively affects the robustness of qualitative research. The present study has been prepared to contribute to solving these issues observed in the literature. The study explains the characteristics, purposes, differences, and necessary steps of content analysis and thematic analysis approaches, which are frequently used in the analysis of qualitative data. Additionally, the study highlights the principles that should be considered in conducting content and thematic analyses, with the hope of assisting researchers in carrying out a rigorous and robust process.

Publisher

Edu Yayıncılık Eğitim, Danışmanlık, Proje Yönetimi San. Tic. Ltd. Şti.

Reference41 articles.

1. Altheide, D. L. (1987). Ethnographic content analysis. Qualitative Sociology, 10(1), 65-77.

2. Ballinger, C., Yardley, L., & Payne, S. (2004). Observation and action research. In D.F. Marks & L. Yardley (Eds), Research methods for clinical and health psychology (pp.102-121). London: Sage.

3. Bloor, M., & Wood, F. (2006). Keywords in qualitative methods: A vocabulary of research concepts. London: Sage.

4. Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage.

5. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3