The True Face of the Right to Privacy on the Example of the Secret of Confession in Criminal Proceedings

Author:

Wielec Marcin

Abstract

The scientific paper concerns the image of the right to privacy on the example of the secret of confession in criminal proceedings. First of all, the introductory comments, including the scope of the study, will be provided. After that, considerations regarding the concept of privacy as a term of fundamental importance will be presented. This will also include an indication of privacy features. Then, the right to privacy will be presented with the definition of elements forming its concepts. After the above, criminal proceedings will be outlined as an area of applying the right to privacy in criminal law practice. This will give the opportunity to present a legal institution in procedural criminal law, which is an example of the functioning of privacy. For this reason, the study will analyze the secret of confession and will deal with the relationship between the penitent and the confessor. The current reasoning in study will lead to the analysis of the standards of Polish criminal proceedings with the legal institution of the secret of confession. In this context, it will be also important for paper to deal with the sources of the secret of confession and analysis of the secret of confession in other legal acts of the Polish legal system, apart from the Code of Criminal Procedure. The paper ends with a concise summary where it will be noticed that the secret of confession is the highest-ranking example of respecting the right to privacy in criminal proceedings. The analysis contained in paper also applies to natural law.

Publisher

Central European Academic Publishing

Reference94 articles.

1. Andrzejczuk, R. (2002) Prawo do wolności religijnej [The right to religious freedom]. Lublin: Diocesan Publishing House in Sandomierz.

2. Bafia J., Bednarzak J., Fleming M., Kalinowski S., Kempisty H., Siewierski M. (1971) Kodeks postępowania karnego, komentarz [Code of Criminal Procedure, commentary]. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer.

3. Banaszak, B. (2004) Prawo konstytucyjne [Constitutional law]. 3rd edn. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.

4. Banaszewska, A. (2013) ‘Prawo do prywatności we współczesnym świecie’ [The right to privacy in the modern world], Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 13, pp. 127–136; https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2013.13.11.

5. Braciak, J. (2004) Prawo do prywatności [Right to privacy]. Warszawa.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3