STUDY ON THE ESSENTIALS PARTS OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING

Author:

Yadav Sanjay Kumar

Abstract

Over the previous decade, cooperative learning has arisen as the main new way to deal with study hall guidance. One significant justification its support is that various examination concentrates in K–12 study halls, in assorted school settings and across a wide scope of content regions, have uncovered that understudies finishing cooperative learning bunch jobs will in general have higher scholastic grades, higher selfesteem, more prominent quantities of positive social abilities, less generalizations of people of different races or ethnic gatherings, and more noteworthy cognizance of the substance and abilities they are concentrating Furthermore, the viewpoint of understudies functioning as "scholarly introverts" in homerooms is altogether different from that of understudies working cooperatively and cooperatively in and as "cooperative learning scholarly groups" Even with it's anything but, a larger part of the gathering assignments that instructors use, even educators who guarantee to utilize "cooperative learning," keep on being cooperative gathering undertakings not cooperative learning bunch errands. For example, virtually all "jigsaw" exercises are not cooperative learning jigsaw exercises. Just on the grounds that understudies work in little gatherings doesn't imply that they are collaborating to guarantee their own learning and the learning of all others in their This accentuation on scholarly learning accomplishment for every person and all individuals from the gathering is one element that isolates cooperative learning bunches from other gathering undertakings.

Publisher

International Association of Research Scholars

Reference10 articles.

1. Adams, E.R.(2012). The effects of cooperative learning on the achievement and self-esteem levels of students in the inclusive classroom. Dissertation Abstracts International-56/05,P.1741.

2. Ahuja, A.(2013). The effects of a cooperative learning instructional strategy on the academic achievement attitudes towards science class and process skills of middle school science students. Dissertation Abstracts International-A55/10,P.3149.

3. Anderson, D., Johnson, D.W., Johnson, J., & Johnson R.T.(2015). Effects of cooperative versus individualized instruction on student pro-social behavior, attitudes toward learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology,68(4),446-452.

4. Parker, R. (2014). Small-group cooperative learning. The Education Digest, 51, 44-46.

5. Sharan, S. & Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (2013). A group investigation method of cooperative learning in the classroom. In S. Sharon (Ed.), Cooperation in Education. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3