Malaria Paradoxes of the U.S. Civil War

Author:

Shanks G. Dennis12

Affiliation:

1. Australian Defence Force Malaria and Infectious Disease Institute, Enoggera, Queensland, Australia;

2. School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Abstract

ABSTRACT. The U.S. Civil War (1861–1865) pre-dated modern understanding of malaria. Yet, malarial diseases (remittent fever, intermittent fever, typho-malarial fever) were frequently reported as causes of morbidity and mortality in soldiers. Modern readers find Civil War-era descriptions of malaria contradictory or paradoxical. For example, although the concept of race-specific immunity to tropical diseases was widely accepted, malaria mortality rates were reportedly more than three times higher among Black than White Union soldiers (16/1,000/year versus 5/1,000/year). Also, malaria rates were reportedly lower among prisoners of war at the infamous Andersonville, GA, prison camp than among Confederate soldiers in the same area. Literally tons of quinine were given prophylactically to Union soldiers deployed in the southern United States, but blackwater fever was not reported by medical officers. All three paradoxes have reasonable modern explanations that give credence to the astute clinical observations of our scientific predecessors during the U.S. Civil War.

Publisher

American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

Subject

Virology,Infectious Diseases,Parasitology

Reference14 articles.

1. The Medical and Surgical History of the War of the Rebellion (1861–65);Smart

2. The Medical and Surgical History of the War of the Rebellion (1861–65): Pt. 1 Medical History;Woodward,1879

3. Malarial fevers in the United States Army and at selected stations;Love,1926

4. The Negro as a Soldier in the War of the Rebellion The Military Historical Society of Massachusetts;Hallowell,1897

5. Outlines of the Chief Camp Diseases of the United States Armies: As Observed during the Present War;Woodward,1863

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3