Assessment of Antibiotic Resistance among Clinical Isolates of Enterobacteriaceae in Nepal
Author:
Basnet Ajaya12, Shrestha Mahendra Raj3, Tamang Basanta2, Pokhrel Nayanum4, Maharjan Rajendra3, Rai Junu Richhinbung5, Bista Shrijana6, Shrestha Shila1, Rai Shiba Kumar7
Affiliation:
1. Department of Medical Microbiology, Shi-Gan International College of Science and Technology, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal; 2. Department of Microbiology, Nepal Armed Police Force Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal; 3. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Nepal Armed Police Force Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal; 4. Research Section, Nepal Health Research Council, Kathmandu, Nepal; 5. Department of Microbiology, Maharajgunj Medical Campus, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal; 6. Central Department of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal; 7. Department of Research and Microbiology, Nepal Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
Abstract
ABSTRACT.
Clinicians face a global challenge treating infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae because of the high rate of antibiotic resistance. This cross-sectional study from the Nepal Armed Police Force Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal, characterized resistance patterns in Enterobacteriaceae across different antimicrobial classes and assessed incidences of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) infections. Enterobacteriaceae from clinical samples were isolated on blood and MacConkey agar, except for urine samples on cysteine lactose electrolyte–deficient agar. To determine antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, including MDR and XDR, the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method was used. Statistics were performed using SPSS, v. 17.0. Members of the family were identified in 14.5% (95% CI: 16.2–12.8%) of the total samples (N = 1,617), primarily in urine (54.7%, 128/234), blood (19.7%, 46/234), and sputum (15.0%, 35/234). Escherichia coli (n = 118, 44.2%) was the most predominant bacteria, followed by Citrobacter freundii (n = 81, 30.3%). As much as 95.6% (392/410) of the isolates were penicillin-resistant, whereas only 36.2% (290/801) were carbapenem-resistant. A total of 96 (36.0%) MDR and 98 (36.7%) XDR Enterobacteriaceae were identified. Proteus mirabilis (44.4%, 8/18) predominated MDR cultures, whereas C. freundii (53.1%, 43/81) predominated XDR cultures. Multidrug resistant (38.4%, 71/154) and XDR Enterobacteriaceae (22.7%, 35/154) were chiefly uropathogens. Fluoroquinolone resistance rates in non-MDR, MDR, and XDR isolates were 19.9%, 63.2%, and 96.2%, respectively, whereas cephalosporin resistance rates were 28.6%, 72.9%, and 95.4% and penicillin resistance rates were 67.0%, 97.4%, and 98.0%. One-seventh of patients visiting the hospital were found to be infected with Enterobacteriaceae, and of these patients, at least one-fourth were infected with MDR strains.
Publisher
American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Reference29 articles.
1. An overview of the antimicrobial resistance mechanisms of bacteria;Reygaert,2018 2. Mechanisms of resistance and clinical relevance of resistance to β-lactams, glycopeptides, and fluoroquinolones;Rice,2012 3. Multidrug resistant and extensively drug resistant bacteria: a study;Basak,2016 4. Characteristics of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia;Mohamed,2021 5. Antibiotic resistance in Enterobacteriaceae: mechanisms and clinical implications;Iredell,2016
|
|