Motivational Systems Theory And The Academic Performance Of College Students

Author:

Campbell Michael M.

Abstract

This study explored the validity of the Motivational Systems Theory (MST) as a measure of performance of college students pursuing business degrees and the level of academic performance attained across gender and race lines.  This goal is achieved by investigating the relationships between motivational strategies, biological factors, responsive environment factors, skill/prior ability, and academic performance of these college students and the impact on the level of academic performance by the college students’ gender and race. The unit of analysis used in this study was 259 college students pursuing business degrees in an institution of higher learning in the south-eastern region of the United States. The instrument of choice was the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) which was used in prior studies to survey the relationship between motivation and learning strategies and performance of students in the disciplines of arts and sciences, philosophy, psychology and natural sciences.  The MSLQ will be used to obtain students responses to 50 questions pertaining to their college experience as relates to their motivation and application of learning strategies. The results indicated that the motivational systems theory is a valid predictor of performance. The female students’ levels of academic performance were higher than their male counterparts irrespective of race. The biological trait, test anxiety, impacted Caucasian females more than the other gender or race groups.  ANOVA confirmed that statistically significant relationships existed between academic performance and demographic variables gender and race. MANOVA confirmed that the differences in performance levels across gender and race lines were statistically significant.  The results strongly supported the premise that the levels of academic performance are impacted significantly across gender and race lines for college students pursuing degrees in accredited business programs.

Publisher

Clute Institute

Subject

General Medicine,General Chemistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3