The use of dedicated methodology and statistical reviewers for peer review: A content analysis of comments to authors made by methodology and regular reviewers-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The use of dedicated methodology and statistical reviewers for peer review: A content analysis of comments to authors made by methodology and regular reviewers

Published:2002-09 Issue:3 Volume:40 Page:329-333
ISSN:0196-0644
Container-title:Annals of Emergency Medicine
language:en
Short-container-title:Annals of Emergency Medicine

Author:

Day Frank C.,Schriger David L.,Todd Christopher,Wears Robert L.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Emergency Medicine

Reference10 articles.

1. The effectiveness of editorial peer review;Fletcher,1999

2. How well does a journal's peer review process function? A survey of authors' opinions;Sweitzer;JAMA,1994

3. Readers' evaluation of effect of peer review and editing on quality of articles in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde;Pierie;Lancet,1996

4. Manuscript quality before and after peer review and editing at Annals of Internal Medicine;Goodman;Ann Intern Med,1994

5. Editorial peer review: its development and rationale;Rennie,1999

Cited by 26 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Randomized Clinical Trials can be Accurately Classified in terms of their Methodological Validity by their Representations and Cochrane Reviewers’ Comments (Preprint);2023-08-21

2. Improving peer review of systematic reviews by involving librarians and information specialists: protocol for a randomized controlled trial;Trials;2021-11-11

3. COMPARE: A Taxonomy and Dataset of Comparison Discussions in Peer Reviews;2021 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL);2021-09

4. What feedback do reviewers give when reviewing qualitative manuscripts? A focused mapping review and synthesis;BMC Medical Research Methodology;2020-05-18

5. Peer review in forensic science;Forensic Science International;2017-08