NATO’s approach to develop cooperation with Japan: Difficulties and prospects

Author:

Trunov Ph. O.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Since NATO’s establishment and Japan’s incorporation into the community of “liberal democracies” these actors hardly cooperated in the sphere of security and defense. In European part of the collective West, cooperation in the security field, with US participation, was multilateral, while, in the Far East, it was bilateral. But the present-day formation of the new world order and the non-West as its part gives a strong impetus to the rapprochement between NATO and Japan. In the new situation, the USA has begun to promote the idea of integrating the systems of deterring Russia and containing China. This inevitably requires substantial NATO-Japan cooperation.The article explores the difficulties, progress, and perspectives of the process by the early 2020s. For this, the author uses the theory of alliances and the method of comparative analysis.The paper presents the practical military difficulties for European NATO member states’ joining the containment of China at the same time as these countries are fully involved in the process of deterrence of Russia. In this situation, the USA encouraged their partners. Firstly, the military potential of NATO as an organization has been growing more rapidly than the strength of the member states’ national armed forces. This means that the Alliance can take part in two confrontations simultaneously. Secondly, this is the arising strategic interest towards the Far East as the new direction of NATO’s global activity. One of the reasons for this was the hasty evacuation of the NATO mission from Afghanistan (2021), which meant the loss of the Alliance’s strategic influence in the Middle East and the necessity to compensate for this loss.But the growing interest of European actors towards the Indo-Pacific region (IPR) was combined with their activity in their national capacities, without involving the auspices of NATO. Trying to change this tendency, the USA have expanded the system of formats in the sphere of security and defense (the activization of QUAD, the creation of AUKUS and the Partners in the Blue Pacific) with the membership of Anglo-Saxon states and Japan. These actors have not only increased their own involvement in the containment of China, but also stimulated European players’ interest towards this.In 2022–2023, the process of political cooperation between NATO and Japan has adjusted and intensified. The parties have prepared the spill-over effect of the cooperation into the military sphere. The paper shows the variants of this cooperation, primarily in the naval field.

Publisher

Association of Japanologists

Reference8 articles.

1. Anischenko, A.E. (2020). Osnovnye etapy formirovaniya sil samooborony Yaponii i novye tendentsii ikh modifiatsii [Basic Stages of the Japan Self-Defense Forces’ Formation and New Tendencies of Their Modifiation]. Khronoekonomika [Chronoeconomics], 4, 38–43. (In Russian)

2. Arzamanova, T.V. (2022). Otdel’nye aspekty strategicheskogo planirovaniya Germanii v Indo-Tikhookeanskom regione v usloviyakh vozvrashcheniya sopernichestva velikikh derzhav [Some Aspects of German Strategic Planning in the Indo-Pacifi Region Facing the Return of Great Power Rivalry]. Aktual’nye problemy Evropy [Current problems of Europe], 4, 258–284. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31249/ape/2022.04.11

3. Dobrinskaya, O.A. (2020). Voprosy mirotvorchestva vo vneshnei politike Yaponii [Peacekeeping in the Foreign Policy of Japan]. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [Bulletin of the RUDN University. Series: International Relations], 4, 721–737. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2020-20-4-721-737

4. Istomin, I.A. (2021). Upravlenie obyazatel’stvami v asimmetrichnykh al’yansakh [Management of Security Commitments in Asymmetric Alliances]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy [International Trends], 1, 26–55. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2021.19.1.64.1

5. Khudaykulova, A.V., Ramich, M.S. (2020). “KVAD 2.0”: chetyrekhstoronnii dialog dlya kontrbalansirovaniya KNR v Indo-Tikhookeanskom regione [“QUAD 2.0”: Quadrilateral Dialogue for Counterbalancing China in the Indo-Pacifi]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political Studies], 3, 23–43. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.03.03

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3