Abstract
In the past decade and half since their introduction, multiple frameworks of mechanistic models were made available to enable the quantification of loss of lithium inventory and loss of active materials. They usually come either with capacity/state of charge- or lithiation-based matching for the electrodes. While both approaches were believed to be equivalent, the present work will show that they are not when used with materials that are not fully delithiated at end-of-charge because they differ on how they account for inaccessible lithium. Herein, we will explain these discrepancies and propose new equations to improve both types of frameworks.
Publisher
The Electrochemical Society
Subject
Materials Chemistry,Electrochemistry,Surfaces, Coatings and Films,Condensed Matter Physics,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献