Affiliation:
1. Mirny Central District Hospital
2. E.I. Chazov National Medical Research Center of Cardiology
Abstract
Presented clinical case report illustrates nonstandart approach use repeat thrombolytic therapy patient 49 y.o. with acute circular – apical myocardial infarction, after noneffective primary systemic thrombolytic therapy rtPA. Moreover, repeat thrombolytic therapy in hospital stage was vital alternative in case with significant tamely delay mechanical reperfusion. After 90 minutes then introduction rtPA has been done, we got negative dynamic on ECG in the form of additional ST-segment elevation at other (early intact) lead, and reccurent anginous pain refractory to standard doses narcotic analgesic. In connection with remote PCI – center, we supposed significant tamely deIlay to mechanical reperfusion. In view of this factors, high risk to undesired event, refractory anginous pain, we made decision of repeat thrombolytic therapy with non-immunogenic staphilokinase, and it has been effective. At a later time the disease is taking it’s normal course.
Reference12 articles.
1. Данные Росстата на 22.06.2019. URL: https://www.gsk.ru
2. Erlikh et al. The First Moscow Acute Coronary Syndrome registry: patient characteristics, treatment and exodus during in hospital stage. Journal Kardiologiia. 2013;12:4-14].
3. Banerjee P, Clark AL, Norell MS. Repeat thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 2005 Jul 20;102(3):515-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.05.067
4. Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, Barbato E, Berry C, Chieffo A, Claeys MJ, Dan GA, Dweck MR, Galbraith M, Gilard M, Hinterbuchner L, Jankowska EA, Jüni P, Kimura T, Kunadian V, Leosdottir M, Lorusso R, Pedretti RFE, Rigopoulos AG, Rubini Gimenez M, Thiele H, Vranckx P, Wassmann S, Wenger NK, Ibanez B; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-3826. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191
5. Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet. 2003 Jan 4;361(9351):13-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12113-7