Author:
Peng Bingzhuan,Yao Zimeng
Abstract
Since ancient times, China has been pursuing the beauty of symmetry and harmony. As symmetry has gradually become a spiritual pursuit, symmetry is often reflected in everyday expressions, just like the idiom "dong X xi Y" which is used frequently in daily communication. Adopting the methods of quantitative and qualitative analysis, based on Construction Grammar Theory, this study first defined "dong X xi Y" as a symmetrical construction, and proposed a cognitive analysis framework of symmetrical construction "dong X xi Y" to analyze its constructional meaning, the construction coercion phenomenon contained in it, and its cognitive motivation. Results show that (1) the constructional meaning of symmetrical construction "dong X xi Y" includes polar construction meaning and critical construction meaning; (2) the "dong X xi Y" construction suppresses the parts of speech and semantics of X and Y; (3) subjectivity is the cognitive motivation of symmetrical construction "dong X xi Y". The study of the symmetrical construction "dong X xi Y" is of great importance for the deeper understanding of the internal structure of the construction and its internal complexity, and in the future it is hoped to provide a cognitive reference for similar constructions.
Publisher
Century Science Publishing Co
Reference28 articles.
1. Antonopoulou E., Nikiforidou K., Construction grammar and conventional discourse: A construction-based approach to discoursal incongruity. Journal of Pragmatics, 2011, 43(10), pp. 2594-2609.
2. Brône G., Zima E., Towards a dialogic construction grammar: ad hoc routines and resonance activation. Cognitive Linguistics, 2014, 25(3), pp. 457-495.
3. Croft W., Radical construction grammar: syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
4. Cui Y. L., The explanation power of coercion for ""periphery"" of linguistic phenomena. Foreign. Language and Literature, 2011, (3), pp. 59-62.
5. Goldberg A. E., Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1995.