Comparison of ICSI and Spontaneous Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Unexplained Infertility

Author:

Başbuğ Alper1ORCID,Yurtçu Engin1ORCID,Keyif Betül1ORCID,Düzenli Fatma Nur2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. DÜZCE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ, CERRAHİ TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, KADIN HASTALIKLARI VE DOĞUM ANABİLİM DALI

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duzce Ataturk State Hospital

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to investigate whether there is a difference between the results of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) pregnancies and subsequent spontaneous pregnancies with a diagnosis of unexplained infertility. Material and Methods: In this retrospective study, a total of 48 women who first conceived with ICSI and then achieved spontaneous pregnancy were included. Duration and causes of infertility, time to spontaneous conception, pregnancy outcomes, and maternal and neonatal complications were evaluated. Results: Maternal age was older in the spontaneous pregnancy group compared to the ICSI group (p=0.029). The gestational age at delivery was found similar in both groups. Although birth weight was higher in the spontaneous pregnancy group, the difference between the groups was not statistically significant (p=0.382). The time to achieve pregnancy was shorter in the spontaneous pregnancy group (p=0.001). Gestational diabetes was significantly higher in the spontaneous pregnancy group (p=0.001), while amniotic fluid abnormality, gestational hypertension (p=0.001), and preterm delivery (p=0.001) were significantly higher in the ICSI group. While the number of babies with the 1st-minute low Apgar score was higher in the ICSI group (%4.16 vs 2.08%, p=0.001), the 5th-minute Apgar score was similar. Conclusion: Even if couples are evaluated as infertile, it should be taken into consideration that they can achieve spontaneous pregnancy. It may be rational to wait for spontaneous pregnancy in eligible couples with unexplained infertility and not to refer the patient for early assisted reproductive techniques.

Publisher

Duzce Medical Journal

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3